Help for a medal and fan or 2 medals???
The figure below shows rectangle ABCD:
The following two-column proof with missing statement proves that the diagonals of the rectangle bisect each other: Statement Reason ABCD is a rectangle. Given Line segment AB and Line segment CD are parallel Definition of a Parallelogram Line segment AD and Line segment BC are parallel Definition of a Parallelogram ∠CAD ≅ ∠ACB Alternate interior angles theorem Definition of a Parallelogram ∠ADB ≅ ∠CBD Alternate interior angles theorem ΔADE ≅ ΔCBE Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) Postulate Line segment BE is congruent to line segment DE CPCTC Line segment AE is congruent to line segment CE CPCTC Line segment AC bisects Line segment BD Definition of a bisector Which statement can be used to fill in the blank space? Line segment AB is congruent to line segment CD Line segment BE is congruent to line segment AE Line segment BE is congruent to line segment CE Line segment BC is congruent to line segment AD
If that is confusing to read, heres a screenshot of it.
@SolomonZelman Could you please help?
what is your opinion about this ?
What do you mean? All I can really say is that I don't understand this AT ALL and I've been stuck on this question for about 2 hours now
ok i will try explain it to you - - so than you read the text of this exercise what wan you prove ? that the diagonals of a rectangle bisect each other - yes ?
so from these 4 statements what are there to select two from these 4 what can be used to fill in the blank space - try select from these 4 just these two what are in contact with diagonals - i not can explain it to you with other words - sorry
so check the first is in contact with diagonals or not - how you see it ?
I'm not sure, sorry.
not is sure so the second is in contact with diagonals ?
yes because BE and AE are diagonals halfed - yes ?
So the second one is the answer?
not just because you need getting two statement from these 4 - yes ?
Yeah
So how do I get the answer then?
so how you see the 3rd is in contact with diagonals or not is ?
No?
why no ? what are BE and CE ? not diagonals halfed same with second ?
I'm not really sure. I don't understand this question at all.
ok check the 4th choice how you see it these BC and AD are in contact with diagonals ? not are because these are sides of rectangle so what will be these two statements ? second and 3rd - ok.?
Ooooh okay. I think I understand now. Thanks for the help. I'll give you a fan and a medal, thanks!
np you are welcome was my pleasure good luck and anytime than i m online bye bye
Bye
@hansC this is same your exercise
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!