Tell why this is not a linear tranformation T(a1,a2) = (a1,a1)
I checked both properties and both seemed ok.
Let's say x=(x1,x2) and y=(y1,y2). I want to prove that T(ax + y) = aT(x) + T(y). T(ax+y) = T(ax1 + y1, ax2 + y2) = (ax1 + y1, ax1 + y1) And aT(x) + T(y) = a(x1,x1)+(y1,y1) = (ax1 + y1, ax1 + y1) They should be different :/
What is \((a_1,a_2)\)? Is it a vector or a matrix with two vectors in it?
I can write this out, \[\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_1 \end{pmatrix}\] Looks like it's a linear transformation to me
It's a vector with two elements
R2->R2
Ok, what's the full question, why do you "know" this isn't a linear transformation? Perhaps they're asking if this is an invertible transformation?
The translation is something like this: For the next T: R2 -> R2, explain why it is not linear: a) T(a1,a2)=T(a1,a1)
Ahhh ok this is different
Hehe sorry for not being clear.
Unfortunately this is still a linear map whether you write it either way: T(a1,a2)=(a1,a1) or T(a1,a2)=T(a1,a1) :O
Weird :S
Can you say that T(a1,a2) = T(a1,a1) ??
You said it, not me
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!