In both Australia and New Zealand, the governor-general has a large amount of official authority, including the right to appoint many officials. Why is the governor-general not considered to be the most powerful position in either of these countries? The governor-general's role is greatly controlled by the king or queen. A new governor-general is elected each year, so each has little control. The governor-general's role is mostly ceremonial with little real power. There are several governor-generals who manage to balance each other.
which do u think
C?
hm thats what i thought as well
but i need 100%
it is not A or B
and it is not D either because there i only one for each
so the answer must be?
not A because neither of those countries have a king or queen and not B because they are not elected every year
does that make sense?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!