In both Australia and New Zealand, the governor-general has a large amount of official authority, including the right to appoint many officials. Why is the governor-general not considered to be the most powerful position in either of these countries?
The governor-general's role is greatly controlled by the king or queen.
A new governor-general is elected each year, so each has little control.
The governor-general's role is mostly ceremonial with little real power.
There are several governor-generals who manage to balance each other.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
which do u think
OpenStudy (truwhovian11):
C?
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
hm thats what i thought as well
OpenStudy (truwhovian11):
but i need 100%
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
it is not A or B
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
and it is not D either because there i only one for each
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
so the answer must be?
ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):
not A because neither of those countries have a king or queen and not B because they are not elected every year