Standing beside railroad tracks, we are suddenly startled by a relativistic boxcar traveling past us as shown in the figure. Inside, a well-equipped hobo fires a laser pulse from the front of the boxcar to its rear. The laser pulse is reflected back to the hobo. The time interval measured by hobo for the roundtrip of the laser pulse is Δt0. Express the time interval measured by us standing beside the tracks, in terms of Δt0.
Let D the length of boxcar and c be the speed of light. In the frame of hobo inside the boxcar, the laser pulse travels a total distance of 2D. The time taken for the round trip is then \[\Delta t_0 = \dfrac{2D}{c}\]
In the frame of us beside the tracks, outside the boxcar : Let \(v\) be the speed of boxcar relative to us. Let \(\Delta t_1\) be the time taken for the laser pulse to go from front to rear. The boxcar travels a distance of \(v\Delta t_1\) towards the laser pulse. Therefore time taken by laser pulse to reach from front to rear end is \[\Delta t_1 = \dfrac{D-v\Delta t_1}{c}\]
In the frame of us beside the tracks, outside the boxcar : By similar reasoning, the time taken by laser pulse to go from rear end to front is \[\Delta t_2 = \dfrac{D+v\Delta t_2}{c}\]
In the frame of us beside the tracks, outside the boxcar : the time taken for the roundtrip of laserpulse is then \[\Delta t = \Delta t_1+\Delta t_2 = \dfrac{2D}{c[1-(v/c)^2]}= \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{1-(v/c)^2}\]
But the time dilation equation from my textbook says \[\Delta t = \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\] what am i doing wrong ?
have you constracted the length of the car? that extra square root would be a quick fix
hey i have just used the speed of light postulate as shown above textbook hasn't covered length contraction yet...
that sqrt is really bothering me yeahh
as you observe it, the boxcar gets shorter in the direction of its travel. so you observe the hobo doing everything in slow motion and you observe the boxcar as shrunk. because c is constant, those two things have to happen to ensure that you observe the photon hitting the leading wall of the boxcar at the same time as the hobo. the formula is the same, the contraction factor is \(\gamma\), just as it is with time dilation. which is why, without really looking at it, i think that's all you need to do to get square with the book.
Awesome! @baru have you understood yet why my equations are wrong ?
i think if you do this: \(\Delta t_1 = \dfrac{D \gamma-v\Delta t_2}{c} \) \(\Delta t_2 = \dfrac{D \gamma+v\Delta t_2}{c} \) the it works if that doesn't get you there, i have a good book that i can maybe dig out
@IrishBoy123 shouldn't the length in outisder frame be \(\dfrac{D}{\gamma}\) ? My mistake is that I have wrongly assumed that \(D\) is same in both reference frames !
i understood that you didn't take into account length contraction while writing the equations from an outside perspective... but qualitatively, the phenomenon still confuses me, because even with the modified equations, light takes a shorter amount of time going from front to rear, than the other way, but we have only one time dilation formula why is that?
you and me have the exact same confusion about the time dilation equation i think i have figured it out this morning... il take explain what i think step by step
Lets define two things : 1) proper time 2) proper length
proper time : When two events occur at the same location in an inertial reference frame, the time interval between them, measured in that frame, is called the proper time interval or the proper time.
Before even defining `proper length`, lets prove below fact Measurements of the same time interval from any other inertial reference frame are always greater than the proper time.
since we don't know yet how the length changes with relative motion, it makes sense to put the length variable perpendicular to the relative motion while studying the relation between time in different frames
yes,i remember that we fix two mirrors, one on the ceiling and one on the roof of the boxcar, and measure time for light to reflect between them right
one on the floor*
yes, lets do that again
in above link, (a) is the frame inside the boxcar, sally is sitting inside the boxcar (b) is the frame outside the boxcar, sam is standing on the platform
the boxcar is going toward right and the light is dancing up and down so this length D "must not" be affected by relative motion. there is no relative motion between sam and sally in the vertical axis
yep
so both sam and sally measure the same length D for the distance between mirrors
our focus in this experiment is to study the relation between time in both reference frames
with the technicalities aside, the relation is just algebra, lets do it quick
In sally's frame, inside the boxcar : \[\Delta t_0 = \dfrac{2D}{c}\] This is "proper time" because sally uses just "one clock" to measure this interval.
alright
In sam's frame, outside the boxcar, the light has to travel a distance of 2L: \[\Delta t = \dfrac{2L}{c}\] This is not "proper time" because sam must use two different clocks (one located at left end and other at right end) to measure this interval.
from the geometry it is easy to see that \[L^2 = D^2 + (v\Delta t/2)^2\] combining the 3 equations we end up with the time dilation equation \[\Delta t = \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\] This holds as long as \(\Delta t_0\) is the "proper time", measure using only one clock.
with me so far ?
http://i.stack.imgur.com/UdADX.png im using this pic for the derivation of time dilation eqn
i didnt exactly get the we need to use 'two clocks' part proper time: measure when we are at rest w.r.t the whole mirror apparatus not proper time: apparatus is moving with respect to us. right?
you're right, but i think it helps a lot to see it from the other angle too
sally requires just one clock to measure the time between the two events : 1) take the timestamp of the clock at emission of light 2) take the timestamp of the same clock at return of light subtracrt the timestamps to get the proper time
sam cannot do the same using just one clock
he requires two different clocks because for him, both the events are spatially separated. he has to take the timestamps from the two clocks located at the respective places.
proper time : timestamps from the same clock not proper time : timestamps from different clocks
ohh, ok got it
forgetting length, do we agree on when the time dilation equation holds ?
\[\Delta t = \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\] holds only when \(\Delta t_0\) is "proper time" measured at the same location using one clock.
yep, agreed
also lets acknowledge again that \(\Delta t \gt \Delta t_0\) as \(\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}\) for all \(v\lt c\)
yep, i see that
so we have this fact now : `Measurements of the same time interval from any other inertial reference frame are always greater than the proper time.`
yep
lets look at length contraction after that we can tackle sending laser pulse from left<->right
if i understand correctly, that sending laser pulse from left<->right is the source of our confustion right ?
yes! our measurement for time taken for light should be greater than hobos regardless of direction
time dilation equation talks about "proper time" right ?
yes
so can i rephrase it like this : our measurement for time taken for light should be greater than hobos "measurement for `proper` time" regardless of direction
yes
lets finish length contraction quick and get back to this..
alright
sam is on the platform sally is in the boxcar
now sam and sally want to measure the length of the platform
sam's frame : sam is stationary relative tot he platform, so sam's length measurements are "proper". Say the measured length of the platform by sam is \(L_0\). Also, sam notes that sally moves through this length in \(\Delta t\). Note that this time measurement requires two clocks. so it is not proper time. \[L_0 = v\Delta t\]
Sally's frame : For Sally, however, the platform is moving past her. She finds that the two events measured by Sam occur at the same place in her reference frame. She can time them with a single stationary clock, and so the interval Δt0 that she measures is a proper time interval. To her, the length L of the platform is given by \[L = v\Delta t _0\]
divide both equations and get \[\dfrac{L}{L_0} = \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{\Delta t}\]
using the earlier time dilation result, above equation becomes \[\dfrac{L}{L_0} = \dfrac{\Delta t_0}{\Delta t} = \sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}\]
same as \[L = L_0\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}\] since \(\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2} \) is less than 1 for all v < c, we have \(L\lt L_0\)
basically we have two results so far :
ok... i'm a bit confused about the 'proper' and two clocks thing again, it the two events occur two different points in space w.r.t an observer, then the quantity is 'improper'?
yes
but there is nothing improper about it
alright
"proper time" is just a phrase used to refer to the time measurement made at a single location using a single clock
ok, got it
using those two results i hope we can handle our main problem of sending laser pulses left and right
me too :D
il rephrase the problem
Standing beside railroad tracks, we are suddenly startled by a relativistic boxcar traveling past us as shown in the figure. Inside, a well-equipped hobo fires a laser pulse from the front of the boxcar to its rear. (a) Is our measurement of the speed of the pulse greater than, less than, or the same as that measured by the hobo? (b) Is his measurement of the flight time of the pulse a proper time? c) which time measurement is greater, ours or hobos ?
yep, looks good.
for part a, the speed of laser pulse must be same in all inertial reference frames according to speed of light postulate
for part b, what do u think
how many clocks does the hobo require to measure the time interval ?
i was about to say proper time, but now i'm thinking, two events spatially seperated
yeah The first timestamp is taken at the front of the car the second timestamp is taken at the rear of the car so he must use two different clocks
wow, that one completely caught me off guard... go on
so clearly the time dilation equation that we have derived earlier does not apply here.
yep
However the length contraction equation still applies right ?
yep
Because the boxcar is moving left to right in the frame of outsider, the length of the boxcar must shrink by a factor of \(\gamma\) \[L = \dfrac{L_0}{\gamma }\]
from the outsider frame, the time taken by the laser pulse to reach from front to rear is given by \[\Delta t = \dfrac{L - v\Delta t}{c} = \dfrac{L_0/\gamma - v\Delta t}{ c}\]
isolating \(\Delta t\) do we get \[\Delta t = \dfrac{L_0}{\gamma c(1+v/c)} \]
notice that \(\dfrac{L_0}{c}\) will be the time measured in the hobos frame inside the boxcar
clearly the time measured in the outside frame is "less" than the time measured in the inside frame
that is against what we expect
your saying that is ok, because \(L_0/c\) is not the proper time
?
\(L_0/c\) is not proper time, so this is not violating time dilation equation. But I do see the issue here. If the clocks run slow inside the boxcar, they must run slow for all events. Not just the ones with proper time measurements. Hmm...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!