Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (jtug6):

Help with this disgusting integral?

OpenStudy (jtug6):

\[\int\limits_{0}^{2} \sqrt{(2t^2)+(3t^2)^2}\]

OpenStudy (jtug6):

@Astrophysics

OpenStudy (zarkon):

factor out a \(t^2\) from under the square root then use u-substitution

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

Is the \(2t^2\) term squared as well?

OpenStudy (jtug6):

My apologies the 2t term is being squared. Must have accidentally mistyped. So it's actually (2t)^2 or 4t^2

OpenStudy (jtug6):

\[\int\limits_{0}^{2} \sqrt{(2t)^2 + (3t^2)^2}\]

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

Use the method suggested by Zarkon.

OpenStudy (jtug6):

Ah. So it'd be integral from 0 to 2 of 4t^2 + 9t^4 we'd factor t^2 out then split the radicals into multiplication then u-sub the 4 + 9t^2 to get du = 18t dt then divide both sides by 18 change the boundaries and then integrate sqrt u?

OpenStudy (phi):

sounds about right. inside you have sqr(u) outside you have t dt which becomes, using du = 18 t dt t dt = 1/18 du so \[ \frac{1}{18} \int \sqrt{u} \ du\] for the limits, u = 9t^2+4. at t=0 that corresponds to u = 4 similar for the upper limit

OpenStudy (jtug6):

right. thanks

OpenStudy (jtug6):

would it be possible to integrate this if we were to add +t's to the x and y instead? so x = t^2 + t and y = t^3+t?

OpenStudy (jtug6):

that integration seems like theres no real way to solve for it unless you use approximation. :o

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

But why?

OpenStudy (jtug6):

Because the question itsself may have been presented incorrectly by our instructor and we were advised to add the extra t. I was just speculating on whether or not it was solvable with the original problem we were given (x = t^2, y = t^3). However, when I did solve it that way the feedback that was given included that i should've added an extra t to both even though it explicitly says on the paper x = t^2 and y = t^3. I really dont know why considering this way is solvable.

OpenStudy (jtug6):

Apparently it was his mistake of using the original x and y but apparently adding in those extra t's makes the problem unsolvable with calc 2 methods lol... i dont know

OpenStudy (phi):

I assume there is more to the original problem? I can't respond without a lot more detail on what you are solving

OpenStudy (jtug6):

The total problem states: Find the exact length of the curve where x = t^2 and y = t^3 from the bounds 0 (less than equal to) t (less than equal to) 2

OpenStudy (jtug6):

I apologize if i'm not making any sense, just been trying to solve these for awhile now. :P

OpenStudy (phi):

ok, and that is how you get your integral

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

I think you need to take the derivative first but I am not sure.

OpenStudy (phi):

I use http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ArcLength.aspx to remind me. if we use his formula \[ \int \sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} \ dx\] with x= t^2 dx = 2 t dt y= t^3 dy = 3 t^2 dt dy/dx = 3/2 t replace dy/dx with 3/2 t and replace dx with 2 t dt and we get \[ \int \sqrt{1 - \frac{9t^2}{4}} \ 2 t \ dt \]

OpenStudy (phi):

* that should be 1 + 9t^2/4 *** if we factor ¼ out of the root we get \[ \int \sqrt{4 + 9t^2} \ t \ dt \] which is easily integrated

OpenStudy (phi):

adding "t" e.g. x= t^2 + t and y= t^3+t seems like that would make it difficult

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParaArcLength.aspx \[\int\sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2}\,dt\]

OpenStudy (phi):

yes, that looks more direct

OpenStudy (jtug6):

right, that's what i used thomas. both of those are correct though right?

OpenStudy (jtug6):

the formulas i mean

OpenStudy (phi):

yes, they are variations. the parametric version is better suited here

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

Did you take the derivative though?

OpenStudy (phi):

thomas' link shows how to go from the first version to the parametric version

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

Paul's Math Notes is love, Paul's Math Notes is life.

OpenStudy (jtug6):

yeah i took the derivaitve. dx/dt = 2t and dy/dt = 3t^2

OpenStudy (jtug6):

from x = t^2 and y = t^3

OpenStudy (jtug6):

anyway thanks you guys. <3

OpenStudy (phi):

I don't know why they suggest adding the "t" wolfram seems to use numerical integration to get an answer.

OpenStudy (jtug6):

neither do i. i'm just sitting here looking @ the feedback and it says "add extra t's" lol......i dont even.... oh well. i'll be sure to ask him during next lecture to see whats up.

OpenStudy (jtug6):

ty for the help though, appreciate it.

OpenStudy (freckles):

have you done a substitution yet?

OpenStudy (freckles):

you only need an algebraic substitution

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[\int\limits \sqrt{4+9t^2} t dt \\ \text{ Let } u=4+9t^2\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

but scrolling up @phi has already told you to use this sub he even showed you how to change the limits

OpenStudy (jtug6):

yeah thanks already figured it out mostly. :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Refer to the attachment from Mathematica v9.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1460859550864:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!