determine if the improper integral converges...
if it does, evaluate it \[\int\limits_{2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{ \ln(x) } dx\]
if the series converges, so does the integral and vice versa
Would \(\displaystyle \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\ln x}\) converge?
Well, you know harmonic series would diverge aint it so? and, \(\displaystyle \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\ln x}>\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x}\)
i thought it would comverge because lim as x approaches infinity = 1/infinity = 0
that is just for divergence
if lim = 0, you can't make conclusions, if lim =/ 0, then for sure diverges
for x > 2 1/(xlnx) < 1/ ln x therefore ∫ 1/(xlnx) < ∫ 1/ ln x the left side can be integrated, it goes to infinity. so the right side must go to infinity
yeah, or that, comparing to x ln(x) or just x ... doesn't matter:)
((you could ideally compare to any x^p: p>0 from some n=j an on (forever), and convergence from n=j would dictate convergence from n=2, since there aren't any singular points over [2,∞) ....) anyway, I got to get back to my stuff. Sorry if I interrupted.
im kinda confused...it diverges?
Yes
let's clarify
\(\displaystyle \int\limits_{2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{x } dx\) would diverge, right? (Because \(\displaystyle \sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{x }\) diverges .... either because it is a harmonic series and we should all know this, or because of the integral test (ALWAYS!! either integral and series both diverge, or both converge), or due to at lest 20 other reasons/proofs of this ....) If \(\displaystyle \int\limits_{2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{x } \) diverges, wouldn't a series that is larger diverge as well?
\(\displaystyle \sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{x } < \sum_{x=2}^{\infty} \frac{ 1 }{\ln x } \) Would you agree with this statement (right above)?
and if 1/x diverges, than all the more so a larger series with 1/ln(x) diverges. (Note: Why is it larger, because ln(x) is smaller than x, so you are dividing by a smaller value, and thus getting a bigger result)
idku used what is known as the integral test. http://prntscr.com/autsto the conditions are that the function is decreasing and positive
actually it would be better if the website wrote "the series and the integral both converge/diverge together".
yeah, that would be more clear.
If you understand the tests for convergence (comparison test, integral test, divergence test ....) then after some practice you will be able to determine convergence/divergence of a series (and via the integral test, you will be able to determine the convergence of an integral as well) in a snapshot.
For example: \(\displaystyle \int_2^\infty\frac{1}{\ln(x!)}> \int_3^\infty\frac{1}{\ln(x^x)}=\int_3^\infty\frac{1}{x\ln(x)}= \\[1.9em] \displaystyle -\lim_{x\to\infty}\ln(\ln3))+\lim_{x\to\infty}\ln(\ln x))\to{\rm diverges}\)
So, what you have here is two steps to solve the problem. First idku used a comparison test, to compare the series to a simpler series ∑ 1/ln n > ∑ 1/n http://prntscr.com/autur4 This implies ∑ 1/ln n diverges. Then we used an integral test, which says the integral and the series must diverge together. If we could combine this in one step that would be ideal, but we can't integrate this function easily.
The fact that the limit goes to zero does not tell us much. It may or may not converge. compare the improper integrals \( \large \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac {1}{x^2} \) and \( \large \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac {1}{x} \). These are easy to integrate so you can see two cases where the limit goes to zero, yet it both converges and diverges. Of course if the limit does not go to zero, the area under the curve will diverge and there is no chance it will converge. Short proof : suppose the limit of f(x) is small nonzero constant. infinity * small constant = infinity
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!