Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (mathmath333):

question (logical reasoning) Unemployement has increased inspite...

OpenStudy (mathmath333):

OpenStudy (mathmath333):

|dw:1461788832406:dw|

OpenStudy (mightychondrion):

I think you can only actually imply assumption number one from the statement since the word "inspite" signifies that it's a contrast to something supposed to happen. Nothing about factors is hinted at in the statement so number 2 would be too much of an assumption not something implied? Not too sure

OpenStudy (mathmath333):

ok thnks

OpenStudy (freckles):

I don't think 2 is implied from the statement because the statement makes no mention of other factors just the one economic growth

OpenStudy (freckles):

and actually reading what @MightyChondrion said I think this is what he is saying too

OpenStudy (loser66):

I don't want to confuse you, but I would like to give out my opinion. Even though the statement doesn't indicate to the factors of the economic growth, but the second choice is an implicit sentence itself. It implicitly acts as counsel for the reason why the unemployment increasing. It doesn't depend on economic only. --> it is an implicit statement.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!