Question

question (logical reasoning)

Should there be complete ban on ...

Answer 1

???

Answer 2

on what

Answer 3

@jhonyy9

Answer 4

i think option a.) is correct

Answer 5

I never seen terms "strong argument" and "weak argument", but I think I understood it from the question just now. Yes, I agree that option A is correct.

Answer 6

strong argument =directly related, not based on personal choice,true, meaningful.

weak argument=contrary to social,repetition, personel

Answer 7

but in book option d.) is given correct

Answer 8

Don't really know, this isn't really maths afterall :P I guess they are both opinionated on the belief that it's bad for children?

Answer 9

i dont know why I is not a strong argument

Answer 10

@jhonyy9

Answer 11

I guess because neither argument support their claims by actual evidence .

Answer 12

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi-55SjrsHMAhXGCD4KHbMzB78QFggzMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhdmcmillan.dadeschools.net%2FPDF_Files%2FHomeroom_Activities%2F2009-10%2FWeek%25205%2520(Strong%2520vs.Weak%2520Arguments)%2520(10-5%2520to%252010-09-09).pdf&usg=AFQjCNFTUaHqDnejV6m8tC4JuVqlbVmRuA&sig2=9qGDbV9IhloK4jJp18wlXg
this pdf seems to be good

Answer 13

i like their smoking example

Answer 14

"children are affected" this is an evidence ?

Answer 15

how does it affect children isn't answered

Answer 16

well i already give strong vs weak as par my book

strong argument =directly related, not based on personal choice,true, meaningful.

weak argument=contrary to social,repetition, personel

Answer 17

Ok it is just my opinion
I probably would have said yes maybe if it said it affects children because they like to mimic what adults do...

if they see an adult rob someone, they might think it is okay.
I don't know. You should probably go with your own opinion.