.
Where is the figure ?
Start by writing down the given info
This is what I have
Im gooing to post an image, Check it out
Okay, sure
I cant change the statements I can only fill in the reasons
Like I have filled in all the reason,s but I am not sure at all
Statements look okay. But reasons don't.
1, 2, 3 rows are good.
yea im not too sure about my reasons
for statement 4, can you tell me why DC equals DE ?
i think they are corresponding cause they are on the same sides of each other or they could be parallel
You shouldn't use the term "corresponding" for sides.
Triangle DCE is what kind of triangle ?
Acture
Actue*
Notice that it has two equal angles, so it is an isosceles triangle.
ohh my bad
The sides opposite to equal angles are equal.
So you may put that as a reason for the statement 4
oh ok thanks, so i should never use corresponding for sides right?
I've never heard of the phrase "corresponding sides" We have "corresponding angles" though
ok thanks, so what about the rest of the reasons?
In #5 and #6, you're adding segments, so you may use below postulate as the reason : http://study.com/cimages/multimages/16/segment_addition_postulate-_diagram_1.png
ok
i never heard of that prostulate thanks!
That's okay. It says a simple fact : When you add two pieces, you get a big piece.
so do i use this for every statement that requires adding segments?
You may use it when required. But in the present proof only #5 and #6 are using it.
In #7 and #8, you're substituting stuff, so you may simply put below as your reason : ``` By substitution property ```
In #9, you have subtracted something from both sides, so you put this as your reason : ``` By subtraction property of equality ```
#10 looks exactly same as #9 right ?
Um well
For number 10 EF has a line intop of it and so does CB, then the equal sign has a squigly line over it
and 9 is as you see it
Ohk, I think you may put something like below as your reason for #10 : ``` Segments of equal length are congruent. ```
Have I said before that we should never utter the phrase "corresponding sides" ?
Yes you said that
I was completely wrong with that. We use that phrase all the time while comparing sides of congruent and similar triangles.
oh ok
So does that mean my reason for number 9 is correct?
No. Does my reason for #9 make sense ?
Not really could you explain, how it would be subtraction?
Look at statements #8 and #9 Can you tell me what you did to statement #8 to get statement #9 ?
oh I see it now
Im starting to see how these two columns works
cause the addition in 8 reulsted in have a final answer in 9
are my 11 and 12 right?
Yes, they look good.
You should insert a new row between 12 and 13
statements #11 and #12 and #1 imply that ``` angle ACB = angle GEF ``` right?
true, like I said before I have no control over the statements, only the reasons
I wish I could but I dont know how its like blocked
Ohk... For last reason, can you guess the congruence postulate that we may use to justify here ?
dont tell me yet, let me try to figure it out
We have two angles and the included side pairs in the triangles congruent, so...
ASA?
Exactly!
http://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/congruent_triangles/images/ASA/picture-laballed.png
hahaa thanks though I was about to answer something else
what is the difference between SAS and SSA
Let me ask you a question
Suppose I give you one triangular shaped cookie. http://rlv.zcache.com/chocolate_chip_cookies_triangle_sticker-rf16a84dc179d4c9d9b6ec12a7b6c5bc8_v9w05_8byvr_324.jpg
Don't eat yet.
Then I give you another triangular shaped cookie : http://www.sweetopia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/triangle-christmas-tree-easy-christmas-tree-cookie-300x450.jpg
Here is the question : Are they both of same shape and size ?
umm...yes?
How did you figure that out ?
They both are triangular. But they could have different lengths, right ?
What lengths must you measure to be sure ?
Yea true, I think i just took a guess
equilateral triangles?
Not necessarily. Assume they're some random triangles.
oh ok
If the both cookies have all three corresponding angle pairs equal, then can we say the triangles are congruent ?
no, because they might have the same angles, though the size can differ.
they could be called similar triangles
in dilation the size of the angles dont change only the length of the sides
Ganshie I have one problem, would you mind helping me with it
Very good. So we cannot say the triangles are congruent even when all the 3 corresponding angles pairs are congruent.
Wait. Let me finish answering your question
Ok
I'm trying to address below question ``` what is the difference between SAS and SSA ```
AAA means Angle Angle Angle It is a shortcut for saying that all the 3 corresponding angles pairs in the two cookies are equal.
hi dear my friend - sory but i not can answering to you with message bc. my submitt button is blocked again too ,not solved it again i ve wrote to OS team but not made nothing in this case
Its ok Ill just ask ganshie!
Oh sorry about that @jhonyy9 . Openstudy has merged with Brainly and they seem to be busy with all the formal stuff...
SAS means Side Angle Side
@ganeshie8 you dont seeing me but i m here daily in the night ,oh yes night here in Europe what i think in Florida or in the est part of your country is night too but in the other part is day
Ganshie Could I insert my next question?
I got the SSA and SAS AAA and others
@ganeshie8 do you really wan,like i repost these my questions about primes,super twins,star-twins,family tree of primes ,...? just because @Directrix have wrote me on feedback that he like i repost these my deleted questions
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!