Graphing a parametric
This is part 2 to the last question I asked... x = tan^2 theta y = sec theta -pi/2 < theta < pi/2 I need to graph it. I made a t-chart, but I'm a little confused by the endpoints. pi/2 is undefined for tan, right?
So would the endpoints be asymptotes?
Desmos is showing pi/2 as defined...
You have just eliminted the parameter, so you can just use that to graph it.
So I wouldn't need to make a t-chart? Wouldn't pi/2 still be undefined for x though? According to the original x equation
When we eliminated \(\theta\), we got: \(\displaystyle y^2-x=1\). Alternatively, \(\displaystyle y^2=x+1\). Note that we had: \(\displaystyle \theta \in \left(-\frac{\pi}{2},~\frac{\pi}{2}\right)\). so take that into account. (Sorry I hate to disconnect)
(basically you are graphing \(y^2=x+1\) over \(x\in(0,\infty)\).
I still don't get how pi/2 is defined... Shouldn't making a t-chart give me the same graph as eliminating the parameter? Also, shouldn't I be graphing it from -pi/2 to pi/2? Not from 0 to infinity?
The graph is NOT showing t=pi/2 defined. It's showing x=pi/2 defined. Do you see the difference?
The fact that you labeled your x-axis with trig values is maybe what's making things confusing.
Oh, I think I see what you're saying... But wouldn't x be undefined at t = pi/2 ?
\[\large\rm \lim_{t\to \pi/2}\tan^2t=\infty\]This value t=pi/2 is what's extending our function infinitely in the x-direction, ya? When t is near pi/2, x is really really big.
So say I was trying to do this problem without eliminating the parameter, just by doing a t-chart. When I plug in pi/2 for x, it's undefined. So wouldn't there be an asymptote or something there? Sorry, this is really confusing me :/
|dw:1477242291576:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!