Question

http://prntscr.com/d3x2p6

Answer 1

@sooobored

Answer 2

just need to complete the proof

Answer 3

your first statement is always the information that they give you "angle 2 and angle 5 are supplementary" the reasoning of this is always "given"

Answer 4

yea

Answer 5

the last statement will always be what you are trying to prove
"prove l and m are parallel"

Answer 6

angle 2 is equal to angle 3, any guesses on the reasoning?

Answer 7

vertical angles

Answer 8

yup, how about 3 and 5 are supplementary?

Answer 9

same side interior angles???

Answer 10

idk how to word it

Answer 11

i believe the term is interior consecutive angles

Answer 12

whta is the reason for the 4th one

Answer 13

actually, i think reason 3 would be the substitution or transistive property

you would use the consecutive interior angle theorem in order to prove that the lines are parallel

Answer 14

since you know 2 and 5 are supplementary, and 2 is equal to 3, hence 3 and 5 must be supplementary

Answer 15

what

Answer 16

and we cant assume 3 and 5 are supplementary because we dont "know" we have parallel lines cut by a transversal

Answer 17

yeah i changed it

Answer 18

Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem

Answer 19

idk

Answer 20

that would be the last reason for proving parallel lines

Answer 21

how do i word it

Answer 22

i jsut winged it