The function m(x)= (x+3)/(x-2 on the interval [0,5 does not have any absolute extreme values. Does this contradict the Extreme Value Theorem?
No, Look at x-2 in the denominator
so it does not contradict the theorem meaning or it does since it does not have a max or min point.
The function must be continuous on the whole interval. Is yours continuous?
I belive so
No it is not continuous at x=2. Why?
since it is continuous over x=2 not at x=2
The denominator is zero at x=2 and the numerator is not.
Since the function is not continuous. It does not have to have a max or min on the interval [0,5]
The extreme value theorem is about continuous function. So the Theorem is not violated
ah I see, so since the denominator is zero at x=2 and the numerator is not, that makes the function not continues which will not produce any max or min within the intervals, correct?
Yes
that does not make any sense, if the theorem is about continues function and the function i have is not continuos, how can the theorem not be violated?
*continuos
The theorem might not be true if the function is not continuous. So for you function, the theorem does not apply, so there is no contradiction. That should be your answer.
oh okay well thank you for all of your help!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!