proof and reasoning
@563blackghost
anyone..
@Vocaloid
heyo, let me take a look at it...
thnxx
this might take a while...i have done triangles but this seems a bit different from the ones i've done...
take your time
i think it needs like one of those ssa aas yknow rules
SSA is not a proper rule you can use btw
in any case AB = AC by definition of isosceles triangle
XB = XC by definition of midpoint
then we want to say that <ABC = <ACB (I forget the reason) in order to use SAS to say the triangles BAX and CAX are similar triangles then CPCTC to say that <BAX = <CAX
hmmm We are given that \(\bf{\triangle ABC}\) is Isoceles with Vertex \(\bf{\angle BAC}\) and that \(\bf{X}\) is the midpoint of \(\bf{BC}\). Since we are told that the triangle is isoceles because of the vertex it would mean that \(\bf{AB=AC}\) due to def. of isosceles triangle. Since X is the midpoint of \(\bf{BC}\) this means that the segment is split in the middle, this saying that \(\bf{BX=BC}\).. ....and @Angle already said this....
well then... I would agree with the CPCTC...
@563blackghost I like the way you explained it better :) I missed reason for one of the things, do you know what it is? I can't think of it
Reflexive probably? for AX=AX?
no...wait that would be after...
<ABC = <ACB it's the base angles of the isosceles triangle are equal I'm not sure what the specific rule is called or if you're allowed to use a rule like that in the proof
Thank you both sooooooooooooo much!!
|dw:1512618531620:dw|
I wouldn't know how to apply that as part of the proof...i feel like im missing something...
Given X is the midpoint of BC Given |dw:1512618786105:dw|
@Logic007 As I mentioned in my first comment, SSA cannot be used to prove triangle congruence
Which means that BXA is right and CXA is right too. Meaning AX=AX thus having that angle BAX is congruent to CAX by CPTCTC...no??
@563blackghost CPCTC doesn't work for SSA or SSS
We proved that BX=CA, and we can see that BXA is right and CXA is right too meaning that BXA=CXA. They share a segment being AX=AX by reflexive. We proved triangle BXA= triangle CXA by SAS...corresponding sides are equal to each other so angle BAX = angle CAX... hmmmmmm
no...i cant just assume right angle... darn
ohhh yes that is another way to prove it but saying the perpendicular bisector of BC goes through X and A is a little difficult to prove; although it should have a name to this rule
well for X to intersect vertex A would be definition of a bisector....
Im thinking of saying BA=CA and BX=CX thus \({\angle XBA=\angle XCA}\) but i dont think that works....
Are you sure this is the whole picture, cause the pic looks a little cut off (it could be showing right angles....) just asking @Sarah10
yes
ok
i swear i have been trying to keep up .. can someone please summarize it if you have time
|dw:1512620187832:dw|
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Angle @563blackghost CPCTC doesn't work for SSA or SSS \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) This does work. Did some researching.
What reason did you find for \(\bf{\angle ABX = \angle ACX}\)? Just wondering.
XD i didn't see that...ah ok
http://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/congruent_triangles/isosceles-triangle-theorems-proofs.php Base Angles Theorem for Isosceles Triangles
writing this one down....
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!