In this psychological thriller, Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis) is shot in his home by an ex-patient who believed he was mistreated. The man then turns the gun on himself. “The next fall”, Crowe takes on a new case, a boy named Cole Sear (Haley Joel Osment). He exhibits some of the same problems as the patient that shot himself. Maybe this will be Malcom’s redemption.
Transitioning is not the film’s strong point. The scene blacks out and goes into a different setting, which leaves viewers with questions and anticipation. However, it is not effective because the unexpected does not happen. There is an abundance of background information that takes away from the overall importance of the film.

Question

AngeI · Answer

Is there more to this question?

kaylak · Answer

I need to make it better. It's a film analysis

AngeI · Answer

Well we cannot really help with that without watching the movie

kaylak · Answer

You could give me advice on my essay as a whole.

AngeI · Answer

It looks fine as is but like i said I lack context

dude · Answer

“The next fall”

I don't think this needs quotations, you can say that it was in the following fall-of when the events happened.

I agree with AngeI, you can include more context of the movie to the film, there was a too much of a quick transition of events from the man turning the gun on himself.

`Maybe` -- you know what the movie is, if you wanted to talk about a possibility in the mans action you could mention what he might've done according to you -- but this is an analysis I wouldn't include many indecisive areas unless the movie intentionally made it questionable [Like the questionable transitioning you mention]

Background information like what? Explain more on what exactly they director included that could've dissuaded the viewer from the main focus. [ex. small quests they had to do]