Can something be made out of nothing? Is the universe a product of the "something from nothing" theory? Would that not be breaking the law of conservation of mass? "Matter cannot be created nor can it be destroyed"
If you throw a grenade in a room with a mess, that room is not going to be organized, it is going to be destroyed more. It is not possible that a great explosion has created the world and the wonders that it has.
Are you saying there is an external agent with the capability to bend the laws of time and space? I agree that the idea of the BBG is extremely illogical. The world was woven together decisively everything compliments the other. Fish were placed in the sea for a reason.
Exactly. Some people believe that the external agent is God, while others disagree, but yes there is someone or something beyond us with the power to create all of the universe.
So, I think you have what you need to answer the question :)
It wasn't a question I needed an answer to I just wanted to see the different points of view, and illogical rationale some people are able to come up with. We just happened to agree
Yeah\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Floo It wasn't a question I needed an answer to I just wanted to see the different points of view, and illogical rationale some people are able to come up with. We just happened to agree \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
from my studies and following the big bang theory the universe was created not in an explosion but in the retraction of the explosion because the particles that were already there not created collided and built up and gasses were gathered and that is the start of everything forming the particles and gasses and such were already there tho.
So you are basically saying there was something pre-explosion? That goes against the BBT in general
So when was the universe bound up in singularity? Btw there was technically no "explosion", but an expansion if you will.
Yeah
i feel as if this is a trick question-
but yes
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Floo So you are basically saying there was something pre-explosion? That goes against the BBT in general \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) well time is a loop what if the beginning was just another end and vise versa
If that was the case then the question could be "do we really exist" are you even talking to me right now" and so on We as humans cant make sense of something like that because it is too astronomical for us to comprehend. But it also makes no sense because you are theorizing there was a pre universe that somehow became nothing which is the opposite of the "nothing to something theory" Which also raises the question "How did it get destroyed" Matter cannot be destroyed by human means nor can it be made
This is like saying squared circles exist just cannot be true
what did my brain do to you to deserve this?
lmaooo
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @yoboijarvis lmaooo \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) lol
ga
No, it's not necessarily possible for something to be made out of nothing, because everything is called a something because it is a thing. But a thing is called a thing because it is made out of something
🤯
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @solaimon23 ga \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) yessirrr
lol
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @snowflake0531 No, it's not necessarily possible for something to be made out of nothing, because everything is called a something because it is a thing. But a thing is called a thing because it is made out of something \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) *mind explosion*
feeling great today
i absolutely\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Floo If that was the case then the question could be "do we really exist" are you even talking to me right now" and so on We as humans cant make sense of something like that because it is too astronomical for us to comprehend. But it also makes no sense because you are theorizing there was a pre universe that somehow became nothing which is the opposite of the "nothing to something theory" Which also raises the question "How did it get destroyed" Matter cannot be destroyed by human means nor can it be made \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) loving the philosophy but i am saying matter is immortal and the universe is on a clock and when it runs out it is reset the matter never leaves it is just torn apart and put bac together again
Was not being philosophical, and yes you're right normal matter and dark matter can indeed get torn apart, but "not" destroyed. When you said the "beginning can be another end", I assumed literally ending and starting over. Thanos mentality. Which is plausible, but since it was "torn" not "destroyed". Would there not be signs of previous life on earth. Life that has already discovered the wonders of new medicine and technology. Should we not find remains of a more advanced people instead of cavemen caves, and Aztec homes? Unless the universe itself is going through metamorphism and transmogrifying the world. That would mean the universe is an intellectual motherboard or is compliant to "again" an external agent who able to bend time itself. Which makes the most sense.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!