well any thoughts on this? You can always google primary and secondary succession to find out
Tonycoolkid21:
@kingpizza wrote:
well any thoughts on this? You can always google primary and secondary succession to find out
no
KingPizza:
well you can google primary and secondary succession to find out
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
Tonycoolkid21:
@kingpizza wrote:
well you can google primary and secondary succession to find out
no
CarterorWolfie214:
i would go with the third one but i could be wrong
Tonycoolkid21:
k
CarterorWolfie214:
oh and what did you get on the hospitality definition Doc that i shared with you
Tonycoolkid21:
i dont know
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
KingPizza:
wait wait the third one could be true, but are any others true?
KingPizza:
make sure you read ALL the options to find out
CarterorWolfie214:
yes because in secondary an area previously occupied by living things is disturbed—disrupted—then recolonized following the disturbance and in primary newly exposed or newly formed rock is colonized by living things for the first time. the third answer says all of them except the one that says none of them are true
KingPizza:
no that would be the fourth answer, not the third answer,
KingPizza:
so primary sucession is pretty much an area just forming and secondary succession is when an area reforms after some natural disaster like a wildfire I would agree
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
CarterorWolfie214:
ok then but if he gets it wrong not my fault but go with the fourth ig