Does does d(xy)/xy mean in regards to differential equations?
That just means the differential with respect to (xy), like du/u.
So how would I solve that on paper? Would I take the derivative of xy and then take the integral of the entire thing?
The whole problem is d(xy)/xy+dy=0
hang on a sec - need to do something
You can make it something more palatable for you by expanding the differential. That might be best. So, you'd write,
\[\frac{d(xy)}{xy}=\frac{ydx+xdy}{xy}=\frac{dx}{x}+\frac{dy}{y}\]
The equation is \[\frac{dx}{x}+\frac{dy}{y}+dy=0 \rightarrow \frac{dx}{x}=-(\frac{1}{y}+1)dy\]
You can integrate this now.
\[\ln x = -(\ln y +y)+c \rightarrow x=e^{-\ln y - y-c}=\frac{1}{y}e^{-y}e^{-c}=\frac{Ce^{-y}}{y}\]
+c in the exponentiation, but it doesn't matter since it just becomes the constant at the end.
You didn't do any integrating or differentation on that last part right? Just moved things around algebraically?
Note, this could have been obtained in a couple of steps from the first method I mentioned, namely,\[\frac{d(xy)}{xy}+dy=0 \rightarrow \ln xy +y = C \rightarrow xy.e^y=C \rightarrow x=\frac{C}{y}e^{-y}\]
Which last part? Once the 'dx' and 'dy' differentials disappear, there's no more integration.
Nevermind. I think I see. I basically get the derivative of xy, which is 1. Then integrate 1/xy which is ln|xy|
Why do you say the derivative of xy is 1?
Hmm .. doesn't one normally want the answer to a diff eq on the form y=... ? I see you wrote x=...
If you saw \[\int\limits_{}{}\frac{du}{u}\]you'd know what to do. You'd recognize it as ln u.
Well, this would be transcendental in y, which is why it wasn't solved explicitly for y.
Re. the du/u integral, the d(xy)/(xy) thing is in the SAME FORM...so you do to it what you would do in the situation du/u.
I'm just having trouble figuring out with d(xy)/xy means. Is that just something I memorize du/u=ln u?
Okay, if I said, "The anti-derivative of the differential of *something*, divided by that *something* is..?" what would you say to me?
the integral of f(x) / f(x) ?
whatever we are integrating with repect to
or im not sure lol
lol, who's got a headache?
i just got here and i do
Me. I've been struggling with this for over 10 hours now. I hate online school.
In mathematics, it's all about *forms*.
We always try to reduce more complicated problems into forms we already have solutions to.
This is what we're doing here.
We know that, whenever you have the form, \[\int\limits_{}{}\frac{d(something)}{(something)}\]the solution is \[\ln (something) + c\]
Here the 'something' is (xy).
oh yes i get the something thing now
good!
ok , so its just a form I need to memorize basically
Yes.
But even better, understand how we get that form.
But, look, if it's a pain for you and you stress in an exam, just expand the differential like I did above.
Unfortunetly thats just the tip of the iceberg in my lack of understanding. I'm in an 8 week online Calculus II class and struggling very badly.
But thank you for the patience and the help. I think I understand a little bit better now.
There's heaps of online resources. This site for one. Paul's Online Maths Notes are good, as well as www.khanacademy.org.
You're welcome.
I've watched all those videos and looked. They help somewhat, but when I work specific problems I guess recognizing what method to use is where I struggle.
Yes, that's called 'the problem of fluency' in mathematics. You need to do two things: 1) understand the mathematics and 2) recognize what you're being shown so you can access what you know. Sounds like number 2 is hassling you. That's good, though, because it can be fixed.
if I could become your fan again lokisan, i would
Haha I think I'm also having difficulty in the understanding at some aspect as well. The bad part is I have little time to become fluent and understand before I move onto the next subject. I would also fan you 10 times.
hey, thanks myininaya ;)
Can I hire you over skype? lol
lol, just log on here. I lurk around.
The fluency part is 'easily' fixable because all it requires is doing problems.
But
there are two types of problem: (1) closed and (2) open.
Well I'm doing them. For instance right now I'm trying to apply either seperation of variables or integrating combinations to this problem. I think I know what to do but I'm stuck
good stuff lokisan....... you couldn't have said it any better!
Closed problems are the ones you're probably used to, like, if the sides of a rectangle are 7 and 3 units, what's the perimeter? You can work that out easily since it's plug and play. But if someone says, "The perimeter of a rectangle is 20cm. What are it's dimensions?" people come unstuck.
Cheers nadeem :)
Hmm ok well in that same topic then... what if you didn't have d(something/(something) and it was just d(something)
For instance d(xy)=-x/11 dx
Well, Lokisan got one more fan for solving this differential eq :) I hadn't fanned him before (and is till now the only user here I am a fan of ;)
thank you mstud.
re. your question scotty, what would you do if you saw,\[\int\limits_{}{}dx\]?
My current problem is 11xdy+11ydx+xdx=0
I know, I'm trying to make it easy on you.
I can move the xdx over, factor the 11 and then group xdy +ydx to be d(xy)
I would integrade which would be x
Just give me a sec. to sort something non-mathematical out.
No problem
Okay, back. The reason I asked you about \[\int\limits_{}{} dx\]is because I wanted you to tie this idea of 'forms' from the last situation to this one. You've made life hard for yourself by going the route you did.
\[\int\limits_{}{}d(xy)=\int\limits_{}{}-\frac{x}{11}dx \rightarrow xy=-\frac{x^2}{22}+c \rightarrow y=-\frac{x}{22}+\frac{c}{x}\]
There's that 'form' thing going on again in d(xy).
I think the route I went was the completely wrong way because that isn't the answer lol. According to my book its 22xy+x^2=C
Yeah, you can rearrange what I gave you.
11xdy+11ydx+xdx=0 My first instinct is to want to move the xdx to the other side, but I already know this isn't seperable. So I need to use another method.
Yes, you'll need a different method.
It's a lot messier than just recognizing the form of what you've been given and just exploiting it.
Ok so I think I can combine differentials to integrate them as a unit right? the 11xdy+11ydx can combine to form 11d(xy) right?
Yes
That's right.
Ok so from this point, can I just integrate each term?
Just like what I did above.
Ok so you're probably going to kill me, but d(xy) basically means the differential of our "function"?
or do I just leave it alone? d(xy) just becomes xy..
lol, d(xy) means the differential of xy.
\[\int\limits_{}{}d(xy)=(xy)+c\]
I think I'm getting hung up on the definition of a differential
\[\int\limits_{}{}dw=w+c\]\[\int\limits_{}{}d(\cos \theta)=\cos \theta + c\]\[\int\limits_{}{}d(sty)=sty+c\]\[\int\limits_{}{}d(gp^4.78-\frac{q}{a}+x^2e^{xy})=gp^4.78-\frac{q}{a}+x^2e^{xy}+c\]
I think that last thing you posted makes sense. I think I have it losesly in my mind what it means now
See what I keep doing, no matter how complicated it gets?
If you sleep on it, it will sink in.
So it basically negates it. I got it. Thanks dude I'm going to try a few more examples
Okay...good luck!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!