volume of a torus...?
cross section of the circle has a radius of .75 and radius from center of torus to center of cross section circle is 1.5
i got the equations but i cant figure out the positive negative problem with the square root
arman, you can solve this using cylindrical shells. \[\delta V = 2\pi (radius) (height)(elemental.thickness)\]\[\delta V = 2\pi x \left( \sqrt{r^2-(x-3/2)^2}-\left( -\sqrt{r^2-(x-3/2)^2} \right) \right) \delta x\]\[\delta V = 2\pi x \left( 2\sqrt{r^2-(x-3/2)^2}\right) \delta x\]where r = 3/4 (0.75)
Your limits of integration would be x=3/4 to x=9/4.
dang yo i just reposted this up top
i think im supposed to use washers though
oh
Well, that can be done too.
at the end he has us compare our answer via washer to the answer via cylindes
but how?? if you can just tell me what integrals to use and why i can figure it out but i keep having my areas cancell out of i have a root of a negative
ok, just let me do it on paper.
Okay, ready?
I'm going to let a=3/2 and r=3/4.
yesss, thank you so much
\[\delta V = \pi \left[ \left( a+\sqrt{r^2-y^2} \right)^2-\left( a-\sqrt{r^2-y^2} \right)^2 \right]\delta y\]
Did you get something like that at first?
oh wow... i know my problem now
nope nvrmnd i still dont.. yeah thats what i got
Okay, well all you have to do is expand that and integrate. \[\delta V=\pi \left( 4a \sqrt{r^2-y^2} \right)\delta y\]
i integrated then expanded...
\[V=4a \pi \int\limits_{-r}^{r}\sqrt{r^2-y^2}dy\]
x and y are interchangeable (technically speaking) in this case?
No, you're integrating over the interval on the y-axis.
right, but like as long as i sub for that variable, it doesn't matter if you write x or y physical interpretation will rotate obviously)?
well...if you keep to the understanding of what x is in this situation and you stick to the same limits of integration. Otherwise, if you want to integrate over the x-axis, you're going to have to make a substitution for y in terms of x, and then find the differential of y with respect to x. It's more work.
I think I know where you were having problems too.
when you sub you get a negative numberunder the radical
or 0 in this case
If you integrate that expression for y (indefinite integral), you'll derive: \[\int\limits{}_{}\sqrt{r^2-y^2}dy=\frac{1}{2}\left[ y \sqrt{r^2-y^2}+r^2 \tan^{-1}\left( \frac{y}{\sqrt{r^2-y^2}} \right) \right]+c\]
plus constant (didn't show up).
arctan is wayyy too complex for this O.o
and the directions request that it be rotated around the x axis >.<
Now...when you approach the limit r from within your interval, you are going to approach zero in the radical from the positive side...yes, the denominator will approach zero, by arctan approach positive pi/2. When y approaches -r, again, the denom. will approach zero, but arctan will approach NEGATIVE pi/2. When you subtract (i.e. limits), you'll be adding 2 lots of pi/2...there'll be no cancelling.
You need to draw me a picture of how you're supposed to orient it. The volume you get will be the same.
You can just switch axes.
The volume I get is \[2\pi^2ar^2\]
which is the volume of a torus.
Is this for class or fun?!
it can be both you know lol
i dont know anymore than the following: measure your torus: radius of circular cross section of the "tube" = a = _____ (i put .75in) radius rom center of torus to center of tube= b =______ (i put 1.5in) write the integral that calculates the volume of the torus by revolving the circle around the x/axis. show steps. show what A(x) is.
what you got with the 2pi^2ar^2 is correct, hat much i know
Okay...that's no problem...just switch the x's for y's.
I rotated around the y-axis, but if you consider the geometry, by switching labels, 'suddenly' you're revolving the torus around the x-axis.
i understand that... i dont understand why my equations are wrong ><
Well, your setup is right, since we both agreed, so it must be the algebra in between.
i should be using: v= int(pi(root(r2-x2)+1.5) - int(pi(-root(r2-x2)+1.5))
That's the same as what we did above. I used y. You can use x. Whereas I put my circle on the x-axis to rotate, you're putting it on the y-axis. All you need to do is switch y for x in the formulas above. You're not changing the mathematics because, in this context, x and y and dummy variables.
You know, I will set the problem up with a circle on the y-axis. You can punch your teacher for me.
lol i completely agree with everything youve said i just dont know why you got a different answer, ill try it another dozen times and repost if i still fail miserably
This might surprise you, but I got the same formula like I did for y, except now it has x's...
Okay, you have your circle on the y-axis and it's centered at (0,a).
The circle's equation is \[x^2+(y-a)^2=r^2\]
The washer method says that the area of the washer is that of a punctured disc; that is, \[\pi y_2^2- \pi y_1^2\]
haha funny almost like i didnt know you can switch x and y -.- armaan not stupid ><
Solving the equation of the circle for those y-values gives\[y_2=a+\sqrt{r^2-x^2}\]\[y_1=a-\sqrt{r^2-x^2}\]
The area of the punctured disc is\[\pi(y_2^2-y_1^2)\]\[=\pi [(a+\sqrt{r^2-x^2})^2-(a-\sqrt{r^2-x^2})^2]\]
right
happy?
this makes sense
The volume will just be the area multiplied by the 'width', delta x:\[\delta V = \pi[(a+\sqrt{r^2-x^2})^2-(a-\sqrt{r^2-x^2})^2] \delta x\]
From here on in it is algebra and integration. The problem's been set up.
The bit in the brackets:\[a^2+2\sqrt{r^2-x^2}+r^2-x^2-(a^2-2\sqrt{r^2-x^2}+r^2-x^2)\]
sorry for causing the trouble on this :/
yeah, after you punch your teacher, punch yourself
:p
brackets continued...
haha well said
\[4a \sqrt{r^2-x^2}\]
When I expanded above, I forgot the 'a' next to the sqrt expressions.
\[a^2+2a \sqrt{r^2-x^2}+r^2-x^2-(a^2-2a \sqrt{r^2-x^2}+r^2-x^2)\]
should be this ^
Okay, so the volume is now,\[V=4 \pi a \int\limits_{-r}^{r}\sqrt{r^2-x^2}dx\]
But you can recognize the integral as the area of a semi-circle of radius r, which would be\[\pi \frac{r^2}{2}\]
which means your volume is\[V=4\pi a \times \pi \frac{r^2}{2}=2 \pi^2 a r^2\]
Okay?
ok i see, but then why does it not work if you just subtract the original integrals without combining or simplifying
You mean without doing the algebraic expansion way up there?
It should.
But looking at it should make you go, "No way, I'm expanding" because you have radicals and squares.
iight thanks, id say i feel retarded, but given what im trying to learn, i feel pretty normal
yeah, you're doing fine. just need to calm down.
There aren't many people (proportionately speaking) who can understand this stuff, so you're doing exceptionally well.
id say thats a bit of exaggeration haha i seriously want to sit in your shoes though, given what you know
in time...
how much time did it take you?
depends...maths is so large, you're learning every day.
do you have a phD?
Not yet.
so thats what your research is for?
pretty much + work!
= money = food + accommodation + clothes...
do you have a math based job?
Yes, I'm teaching it.
i see, you spend your time at the college either researching or lecturing
what is your phD on?
I was doing some research into biophysics and something called Takahashi's problem. It's a mathematical physics problem.
do you intend to solve or something of that sort the problem?
sorry?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!