How is 10/(1+e^t) supposed to be integrated from limits 0 to 2? Please show steps.
put 1 +e^t= z diff. w.r.t. z , we get e^t dt= dz
what is w. and r.?
ok lets do this way..
divide the num and den. by e^t/2
lol, w.r.t means with respect to.
Sorry, I know you're trying to use substitution, but probably a different method from what I was taught
OH
did it help?
What's the point of dividing num. and den. by e^t/2 though?
That was another method of doing it
I do not think dividing by E^t/2 is a correct step in integrating this though
do with the first method then
My problem is actually, I know that 1/(1+e^t) is lnl1+e^tl, but I don't know what to do with the 10
Using substitution doesn't help
1/(1+e^t) is lnl1+e^tl ???? how did u get that??
dhatraditya, do you have any input?
This is integration....so I need to find anti-derivative
but ur retriceumption is false......1/(1+e^t) is lnl1+e^tl??? no way
So what is the correct integration of 1/1+e^t; could you show me with steps?
the first method works for sure......after putting 1+e^t=z u will get this : intergartion (dz/ (z-1)z
you have yo change your limits appropriately
it is indefinite integral...therefore no lower n upper limits
I actually don't care about the limits, I don't know how to antidifferentiate this
zuuto: will u please substitue what I said.....this works ....I've just done it on paper
limits are 0 to 2 according to the problem
ah...my bad
ankur is right, use substitution. It is the easiest method for definite integrals.
わかて、 すみません
oooh. Is that chinese? Sorry I dont understand it.
sorry, my intention was to understand how to differentiate this, I'm trying it right now
It was a mistake to type it, it's japanese
oh i see.
dont forget to change the limits like dhatraditya said....u can't ignore them when u have integral in z
Can I make a suggestion? You might want to recognise\[\frac{1}{1+e^t}=\frac{1+e^t-e^t}{1+e^t}=\frac{1+e^t}{1+e^t}-\frac{e^t}{1+e^t}=1-\frac{e^t}{1+e^t}\]You can integrate that directly,\[t-\log (1+e^t)\]
Sub. in your limits and multiply by 10.
lokisan is right. His method is superior. and faster.
period :D
:D
coincidentally i just figured that out too
which one?
making the integral into two parts
so it becomes t-lnle^t+1l I think
but u need to get used to substitution as well....u can't just rely on making two integrals every time
Most cases substitution is required, but I'm not how substitution works in this
yes, substitution is a general method. Splitting was more elegant in this case and lokisan correctly spotted that.
I'd say now u have the answer ...try with subs. too
or yeah in the second part of the intergral where you have to integrate e^t/e^t=1, substitution works definitely
:)
ahhh thanks so muchh
now I just need to apply this to the problem, which was 10/1+e^t
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!