Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hi Amistre...any luck

OpenStudy (amistre64):

some... how about you? shall we dance :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

SURE!...I've been just reading over it all to try and make sense of it...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

difference equations go by a more common name of recursion formulas

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

go ahead and post your "problem" page and lets see what we can do with it now :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (amistre64):

I you tubed a few recurrsions and have a better idea of what they are trying to say..... that material of yours is simply atrocious to parse information out of :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

so we are on 2a right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I've been googling and reading for the past couple of days but nothing seems to fully explain it or provide examples with solutions ; ) to guide me

OpenStudy (amistre64):

We have 2 parts to every recurrsion formula; a start and a function 1) X{0} = 0 2) X{n+1}= 1/2 X{n} -1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (amistre64):

These are also refered to as NEXT = NOW + C equations..... and they can be written as: X{n} = k X{n-1} + C as well; they both mean the same thing right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

So lets go ahead and list the first 6 terms; X{0} = 0 X{1} = -1 X{2} = -1' 1/2 X{3} = -1' 3/4 X{4} = -1' 7/8 X{5} = -1' 15/16 X{6} = -1' 31/32

OpenStudy (amistre64):

that does 2a, now for 2b

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so I should start at 0 instead of -1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I had 0 originally

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but you get -1 when you plug in 0 for x sub n

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{n+1} = (1/2) X{n} is the homo part;

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the first term is 0, its our starting term and is the first term :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok just kept going back and forth with the table

OpenStudy (amistre64):

We need to come up with a solution that will make the homo part "fit" the data.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-1 = (1/2)(0) + C -1' 1/2 = (1/2)(-1) + C is what I believe it is getting at

OpenStudy (anonymous):

true...it is like trial and error

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

which looks like the limit?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops missed negative so -1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yeah, thats what it was to begin with, which throws me off, why do this part if its just the same as the last ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

suppose to just drop constant to make it 0--go figure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then have to combine general and particular for complete solution

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yeah :) Now to solve for any value of "n" we do this: X{n} = X{0} + (n-1)d X{0} = 0 so we are left with (n-1)d = X{n} right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

correct!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

So from our table above we can input the values and find a solution for "d" (n-1)d = X{n} keep in mind that this can be written as: (n)d = X{n+1}

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so is trial and error pretty much the method

OpenStudy (anonymous):

using the patterns as a guide

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(n)d = X{3} ; 2+1 = 3 (2)d = -1.75 d = -1.75/2 = .875 :: 7/8

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im not sure about the trial and error method; if you are given an equationand asked to find the constant, then there are ways to determine its value. The trail and error might apply but it is reduced considerably

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-7/8 , i dropped the sign ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i caught it

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{n} = (-7/8)(n-1) does this fit?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

checking on calc

OpenStudy (amistre64):

for n=1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

all sequences start at n=1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

checked it with 3...WORKS!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

of course it works for 1 was checking another ; )

OpenStudy (amistre64):

check for X{6} :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not getting answer

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-4.375 is what you get right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

and it shouldnt be less than -2....

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-2 + (1/2)^n try that :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-1.984375

OpenStudy (anonymous):

works for previous value

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so raised to n-1?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

If we want to know X{n}; we can use -2+(.5)^n X{0} = 0 -2 +(1/2)^0 = -1..... -2 + (1/2)^(0-1) = -2 + 2 = 0

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes ^(n-1) looks good :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{5} = -1' 15/16 = -2 + (1/16) = -2 + (1/2)^(n-1)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

How we work this backwards tho..... to see how we got to it :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-2 +(1/2)^(n-1) = X{n} = 2(X{n+1} -1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

slowly but surely...can't say I'm comfortable with doing alone which is my goal

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-2 +(1/2)^(n-1) = X{n} = 2(X{n+1} +1) <- signs again lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-2 +(1/2)^(n-1) = 2(X{n+1} +1)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-2 +(1/2)^(n-1) = 2X{n+1} +2 (1/2)^(n-1) = 2[X{n+1}] +4

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{0} + 1/2^(n-1) = X{n} right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{0} + X{n} * (1/2) (1/2)^(n-1)......is what we need to be getiing at I think

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{n+1} - X{n} (1/2) [(1/2)^(n-1)] = 0 Does that work out?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

got -1.9375 but lost track let me try again

OpenStudy (anonymous):

works for n=0 working on others

OpenStudy (anonymous):

get -2 for n=1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(1/2)^(n-1) split into (1/2)^n ------- = 2[(1/2)^n] (1/2)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{n+1} - X{n} 2 [(1/2)^n] = 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm taking notes and trying to make sense of it and thinking about the final project I have to create...smh, lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

all for 1 credit, lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that was b correct

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lol.....its so hard to tell these days; but yeah, i think that is what b is going to end up looking like; it is works out.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

x{n+1} = (1/2)x{n} * (D)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what i had originally, lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

just noticed it is blurry

OpenStudy (amistre64):

trying to go that route just messes me up lol....do youhave to follow a certain step by step from the book?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-1/0 does not equal 0.....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

at this point...no just want to make sense of it however I can...more than one way to skin a cat, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is undefined

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-1 + 1 = 0; whicn means -(1/2)X{0} = 1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

.5 X{n} = X{n+1} ..... but that is nowhere near the answers we get in the table; do we just punch thru thill we get a parttern for 1/2^(n-1)?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

wait, I think I see it; X{n+1} = (1/2) * X{n} only works if we do: X{n+1} = (1/2) * X{n} - 1.....when we combine the 2 we get X{n+1} = (1/2)D -2 ;X{n} becomes the variable.... and -1 -1 = -2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(1/2)D needs to equal (1/2)^(n-1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

d=2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

X{n} = (1/2)D - 2; D = X{n-1}

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the general solution gives us a "family" of curves to choose from right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

one for each initial value

OpenStudy (amistre64):

2[(1/2)^n] is our general soluton then right? maybe?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

looks good

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we know we need it; and then we pinpoint it with -2 as a constant right?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!