Is there another way to find the flux of the gradient of a scalar field through a shape than just taking the line integral for a vector field?
thats was going to be my next chapter that i read to the kids for a bedtime story :)
The function i have gives me an unsolvable integral when i use a line integral to find the flux of the gradient..
what does flux of a gradient mean; i know what a gradient is; but flux?
sounds like soldering :)
im given a scaler field im told to find the gradient and integrate it around a shape
the gradient that is.
whats the function?
im gonna read vector fields tonight; i hope its steamy ;)
xe^(yz) my shape is r(t)=<-2rcos(t),rcos(t),2sqrt(2)sin(t)> t is between 0 and pi and my r is 2
Ok; the gradient should be the derivatives of your function in vector format..right?
gF(x,y,z) = <dF/dx, dF/dy, dF/dz> right?
yeah
i cant take the strait line integral and stokes doesnt work because the curl of the grad is zero
gF = <e^(yz),zx.e^(yz),yx.e^(yz)> the gradient vector right?
yup
thats the extent of my abilities with that :)
...
what is a flux?
you cant help me
prolly not :)....give me a week ;)
maybe a little longer
No he's taking the same class you are (calc 3) so he'll probably be covering this later in the term
im taking vectors
didnt cover this in calc 3
really? It was covered in my 3rd semester calc class along with surface integrals, etc. Stoke's, Green's, etc
flux but not this indepth of line integral theory
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!