Prove that the graph is continuous or not continuous at x = 2.
i have attached the graph
its an empty graph
one sec
and a picture is better, since not everyone has microsoft office
sure one sec
there the pic is attached
Or even if they do have office, opening docs from unknown sources can sometimes be problematic.
f(2) exists (infact f(2) = 4
to prove: the lefthand limit has to equal the right hand limit at x = 2
how to prive that without actual functions? my best guess is just to point to it on the graph and say, "see! right there"
do you have pdf
no
i can send you a similar graph which the teacher gave us to review with
i got the picture of the graph now; its just that there is no peicewise function defining the curves
You can see what the left and right hand limits are by looking at the graph.
And they aren't both f(-2)
err f(2)
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 2^+}f (x)=5\neq \lim_{x \rightarrow 2^-}f(x)=2\] Hence f is not continuous at \(x=2\).
k thats one
A function is continuous about a point p if and only if p in in the domain of f, and the limit from the left = the limit from the right = f(p)
f(2) exists (in fact f(2) = 4 is this correct
sprinkle in some epsilons and deltas for good effect :)
one second i will attach the sample graph she provided i think thats how she wants the answers
we can see that there for every epsilon in the neighborhood of L can be produced by a delta such that 0<|x-c|<d in the neightborhood of 2
forget this problem adding a new one
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!