please help to find cubic equation when f' (x) =0 at(-1;-3,5)
f'(x)<0 for x<-1 and x>2
f'(x)>0 for -1
use cardano's method given below
ok you know your derivative is negative then positive then negative, so it is a parabola facing down. the zeros are -1 and 2 so it looks like \[f'(x)=a(x+1)(x-2)\] where a is some negative number. could even be -1 who knows.
is the derivative the cubic? it has 3 zeros...
f' = 0 at -1,-3,5 ?
\[f'(x)=ax^2-ax-2a\] and therefore \[f(x) = \frac{ax^3}{3}-\frac{ax^2}{2}-2ax+c\]
good morning.
howdy :)
i assume this is looking for the cubic so the derivative is quadratic. with zeros at -1 and 2
"please help to find cubic equation when f' (x) =0 at(-1;-3,5)" ??
i am assuming you are looking for the cubic function whose derivative is zero at -1
in other words \[f(x)=a_3x^3+a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0\]
\[f(-1)=-3.5\] \[f(0)=0\] which of course means \[a_0=0\]
a quartic f(x) can have 3 zeros if its a touch and turn, coupled with a thru and thru
that would have 3 f' zeros then
it is a cubic, and they have given us the zeros. the original function is a cubic. the derivative is quadratic. the zeros of the original function are 0, -2 and 4, which means it is \[f(x)=a(x+2)(x-4)x\]
ho ho , that is a 4th degree poly. this one is sposed to be cubic!
how does a cubic have 3 zeros in the derivative? unless the original question is in error....
the derivative only has two zeros: -1 and 2
"please help to find cubic equation when f' (x) =0 at(-1;-3,5" from the original statement ... I find this to either be an error, or the intended question...
it is a parabola facing down, negative until -1, positive between -1 and 2, then negative
f' = 0 at -1,-1,5 is my best interp of it.... right or wrong lol
no it is not error. what it means is that f'(-1) = 0 and f(-1)=-3.5
ooohhh....... that helps, thnx :)
now let me see if i can finish this. before the day is over. lol
ok where were we before we were interrupted?
oh yes, you have a cubic polynomial with zeros at -2,0, and 4 so it must look like \[f(x)=a(x+2)(x-4)x\] where a is some negative number. negative because from the sign of the derivative we know that this polynomial is decreasing then increasing then decreasing. so we just need to find a
The question says that f'(x) is 0 at -1,-3 and 5. But f'(-1)=0 yields a=0!
i guess i cannot read. i read it as \[f'(-1)=0\] at \[(-1,-3.5)\]
Yes but \[f^\prime(-1)=0 \implies a=0\]
actually i get that too. damn
the original quest. says find the equation of the cubic function when f'(x) = 0 at (-1;-3.5) then f'(x)<0 for x<-1 and x>2 f'(x)>0 for -1<x<2 f(0) =0 f(-2)=0 and f(4)=0
in fact it get \[-6a=-8a\]
@satellite73 that means a=0.
think too many constraint to solve this one. yes, know it means a=0 that was what was bothering me.
if a = 0, just use a different letter lol
lets go slow. do we agree that \[f(x)=a(x+2)(x-4)x\] ?
because f is cubic and the roots are given.
The cubic is \[f(x)=ax(x+2)(x-4)\].
ok so far so good. and we agree that a < 0 yes?
thx a mil for the awesome insight, any chance i would be able to graph this equation.....
why?
because of the behavior of the derivative: negative then positive then negative means f is decreasing then increasing then decreasing. so a < 0
to show max an min values and intercepts
and we also agree that \[f(x)=ax^3-2ax^2-8ax\]
i know what they want you to graph, but i think this problem is crap. could be wrong. they want you to graph a cubic that is decreasing until -1, then increasing until 2, then decreasing. and they want it to cross the x axis at -2, 0, and 4.
-4 that is
no it says 4
f(4)=0
when f'(-1) = 0 and f(-3.5)=0 f'(x) = - ; (-inf,-1) U (2,inf) f'(x) = +; (-1,2) <.......-3.5..................-1.....0............2............> + 0 + 0 - - 0 + ????????
little backwards, but still i quandry
I think -1,-3.5 and the f'(x) being 0 date are wrong.
it says f'(-1)=0 it changes direction at (-1,-3.5)
f'(x)=0 could also indicate an inflection point... right?
it is entirely possible that this thing is over determined. you have not only the zeros of the cubic, but also the zeros of its derivative. i will try it later because i gotta go, but i think there is a contradiction here.
no it is not an inflection point because the derivative changes sign there.
if the slope is the same on both sides of f' = 0, that indicates inflection i believe
the signs dont change at -3.5
derivative changes sign. that is what it says.
is inflexion point noy determind by f''?
in inflection point is made sure by f''; but an inflection point can still have a 0 slope in f'
says f'(x)<0 for x<-1 f'(x)>0 for -1<x<2 f"(x)< 0 for x>2
derivative changes sign so f changes direction from decreasing to increasing. still i cannot come up with a. will try later.
"when f'(x) = 0 at (-1;-3.5) then f'(x)<0 for x<-1 and x>2 f'(x)>0 for -1<x<2"
-3.5 is an inflection point..
thx for all the help, egan helmie, south africa grade 12 -2011-provincial assesment task
I see f(x) looking somthing like this if i interpret your info correctly
oh no amistre, this is not a cubic polynomial. i interpret the question to be for a cubic polynomial. cubics do not look like this. also the second derivative of a cubic polynomial is a line, so only one inflection point, where the line crosses the x - axis (i.e. f''(x)=0). i am thinking this question was made up without sufficient thought. you cannot specify the zeros of a cubic polynomial, its value at some point, AND the zeros of the derivative.
in fact i assert that there is no polynomial of degree 3 with zeros at -2, 0 and 4 for which f'(-1)=0. let me see if i fall flat on my face with a (rather simple) proof. by the factor theorem we know that \[f(x)=ax(x+2)(x-4)=ax^3-2ax^2-8ax\] thus \[f'(x)=3ax^2-4ax-8a\] and \[f'(-1)=3a+4a-8a\] the only way for this to be 0 is for \[a=0\] which is a contradiction.
i trust your interpretations and its method; I dont trust that the given information is rigid enough to come to a solid conclusion tho ;)
it is always possible i misinterpreted the question. but it is also possible some math teacher said "gee i will give them a problem to see if they can graph it" without thinking through whether such a thing exists, and that is the last second i am going to think about this.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!