Compute the nth derivative f^{(n)}(t) of the function f(t)=frac{(e^t-1)}{t}. Then compute \[\lim_{t \rightarrow 0}f^{(n)}(t)\]. This is from probability theory dealing with moment generating functions. I'm having trouble solving this.
yuck the latex came out badly
let me re-write
find the nth derivative of: \[\frac{e^t-1}{t}\]
with respect to t, and then take the limit of that nth derivative as t goes to 0
If I was going to attempt it. I would take like 4 derivative as it stands and see if you can develop a pattern? From there, the limit will fall out.
i took a bunch of derivatives, but there are new terms each time so I think you have to write the nth derivative as a series
Let me try something. h/o
ok
hey male sory to interupt but can u check my question please...@ least where i got it sof ar
Yeah, give me like 2 min please
ok no prob
purple did you post your question maybe I can help
Well, vitale, I got half of it in terms of an nth derivative: \[\frac{d^n}{dt^n}(\frac{e^t-1}{t})=\frac{e^t(t-n)}{t^{2^n}}+(-1)^{n+1}...\]. However, I can't figure out how to handle the coefficient or powers of t on the second term. Take the first 3 derivatives. And see if what I have is right for the first part plesae.
Look at that, I'll help purp.
ok
i had maple compute the first 9, and I dont see your first term in the derivatives
I might have it. Try this: \[\frac{d^n}{dt^n}(\frac{e^t-1}{t})=\frac{e^t(t-n)}{t^{2^n}}+(-1)^{n+1}(n!)t^{1(n+1)} \]. Really? At least, on through 3 these work. I broke it up and differentiated e^t/t -t^-1. Then made a pattern. Try it by hand split up. Plug in your n's and see if you get it? :/ This is the best I can do.
If you refresh the page that won't look like pellet >.>
let me see if it simplifies to that, one sec
And in the last term it should be t^-(n+1) not a 1
That works PERFECTLY for me :D
it's not working for first derivative for me
oh woops yes it is
let me check the higher ones
If you plug in 1 to my equation you get: \[\frac{e^t(t-1)}{t^2}+t^{-2}\]. Okay, I did up through 4 and they all worked. But double check it :P
ok let me look at it for a bit
maple is saying only the first derivative works
the other ones are missing terms
what did you compute as the 2nd or 3rd derivative?
Really? Hmmm...Well for the second derivative my equation gives: \[\frac{e^t(t-2)}{t^4}-2t^{-3}\]. Which is what I get doing it by hand. It should only be 2 terms if you don't break up the fraction. Well the first derivative is: \[\frac{e^t(t-1)}{t^2}+t^{-2}\]. The derivative of that (the 2nd of the original is: \[\frac{e^t(t-1)-e^t(1)}{t^4}-2t^{-3}=\frac{e^t(t-2)}{t^4}-2t^{-3}\]. That fits doesn't it?
let me do it by hand and check
Okay.
this is looks like it is working out nasty like lol brb
for the second derivative I get: \[\frac{e^t(t^2-2t+2)-2}{t^3}\]
LOL I KNOW WHY. I"M RETARDED. H/o let me retry xPPPPPP
Sorry for the wasted time D:
no problem im still working on it too.
For the second I get: \[\frac{e^t(t^3-t^2-2t+1)}{t^4}\].
this is maple's nth deriv: \[-\frac{-\left( \frac{1}{t}\right)^n (\Gamma(1+n)-\Gamma(1+n,-t))}{t}\]'
k let me check my second deriv
i got the same as before and just checked it on maple.
Damn, thats an intense nth derivative. lol. GAMMA FUNCTION!!!
yeah haha I don't know what to do with it as far as taking a limit
I see what you mean. Limits of series's are tricky...
well the solution to the limit should be 1/(n+1) since it's a known result in probability
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!