Write the argument below in symbols to determine whether it is valid or invalid. State a reason for your conclusion. Specify the p and q you used. Either the koi are swimming in the pond or the birds are chirping. The birds are not chirping. :. The koi are swimming in the pond.
Which part of this is confusing to you?
I have no idea how to do it .
Well I do know, but if you can't tell me where you're stuck I can't help you figure it out.
never done one before
Do you understand what they mean by p and q?
like p, q, ~p, ~q
Yes, but in this argument, what would you pick for p, and what would you pick for q?
P:Either the koi are swimming in the pond or the birds are chirping. q:The birds are not chirping.
Good guess. I would break it up further. What if we used instead: p: The koi are swimming in the pond q: The birds are chirping
Then what would this argument look like?
Remember that p and q are atomic statements that have a truth value.
u mean in the symbolic form
'Either the koi are swimming in the pond or the birds are chirping' is a compound statement which can be broken up into smaller pieces.
Yeah, symbolically what would the argument look like using the p and q I mentioned?
pVq
pVq
That's the first bit, yeah.
pVq ~q :.p
Right. So is that a valid argument?
then what would the reason for my conclusion be?
that part i am confused on.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!