Can somebody explain how the solutions manual got the attached graph, for the system 2x -y > 4 y< -(x*x) + 2? I came up with the below table.. x =1, 0, -1, 2, -2 y = 1, 2, 1, -2, -2 I keep wanting to draw my parabola upwards instead of downwards, like the solutions manual does it...and I'm trying to follow my table closely when I do so...can somebody maybe figure out where I'm going wrong?
Somebody please help!
Hello again.. You can see that the parabola will open downward because the coefficient on the \(x^2 \) term is negative.
Basically you again want to start your graphs by drawing the curves that represent the edges of your inequalities.
So how do you explain the positive 1 value for x, and the positive corresponding value of 1 for y? How am I to graph that point?
So graph the lines: \[y = -x^2 + 2\]and\[2x - y = 4\]
I have the 2x -y = 4 graphed already...
When dealing with inequalities, always start by graphing the equality first. Then you just have to figure out where to shade.
Excellent.
So graph \[y = -x^2 +2\]
If I was to put 1 in for the value of x , that would make y have a value of 1 right?
That's correct. I think some of the other values in your table are incorrect however. \[-(-1)^2 + 2 = -1 + 2 =1\]
what values in my table are incorrect? And how am I to graph the point 1,1...without it making my parabola go upwards?
At 0, your parabola is a 2. At \(\pm 1\) your parabola is at 1. At \(\pm 2\) your parabola is at -2
As you move farther and farther away from 0, your graph decreases further and further. Hence opening downward.
so the y values for -1 and -2 are wrong?
Indeed.
\[-(-2)^2+2 = -4 + 2 = -2\]
I'm hitting a mental block here...I thought that I had when -2 equals x, y = -2...which would answer your above equation, right?
Sorry, yes your values are correct. I misread them. I'm not sure why (looking at those values) you think that the function is not decreasing as you move away from x=0.
Graph it starting at \(x=0\implies y=2\). Then move right 1 unit and you have \(x=1\implies y=1\). As you pick bigger and bigger numbers your curve will continue to go down. Same as you move to the left from 0.
I'm caught up on 1,1...if I start at x =0, y = 2 (or the y intercept of 2, right?)...I'd go up one then one to the right?
You have y=2. Then you have y=1. You went down one, not up.
As your x moves to the right, your y moves down. As your x moves to the left your y moves down. The highest point on the curve is y=2 when x = 0.
I'm starting to spark..but the light bulb is not on yet..:P
So if I start at the y intercept...for 1,1 I'd go down 1, then to the right one..?
Draw the point (0,2). Then draw the point (1,1) Then draw the point (-1,1)
Then connect the dots =)
for other equations....where the x squared is positive..it's addition to the y intercept...and when the x squared is negative..it's a subtraction of the y intercept, in a sense?
You can think about it that way, but really it's just easier to draw in your points and connect the dots.
I need to think about it in some way....otherwise...whenever I see a positive number for both x and y in my table..I'm going to want to go up...
No you won't. The best way to think about it is to draw your dots. Trust me.
I can't draw dots...unless I know how to interpret my table...
Certainly you can. The point (0,2) is the intersection of the lines y=2 and x=0.
The point (1,1) is the intersection of the lines y=1 and x=1.
Does that make sense?
When you make a table you are making a list of points that are on your curve.
I think it's making sense now....I'll see here soon...because I have another problem involving a parabola..
Just plug in a value for x, get a value for y, then take the pair of them and draw that point.
I hope that helps. I'm going to go have dinner. I'll talk to you later or you can email me if you like.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!