(x-y)dx+(x+y)dy=0
int(x-y)dx and try to derive it back down to (x+y)
\[\int(x-y)dx\] \[{x^2 \over2} -yx +g(y)\] \[Dy(\frac{x^2}{2}-yx +g(y))=(x+y)\]
what do you mean by "Dy"?
Dy is another symbol for 'derivative with respect to' ... well, in this case its with respect to y
i dont quite follow, sorry
\[Dy(\frac{x^2}{2}-yx+g(y))=-x+g'(y)\] \[-x+g'(y) = x+y\] solve for g'(y) maybe?
When you say Dy, are you referring to partial derivatives?
i spose thats a way to view it yes.
u need to find the solution?
\[Dy =\frac{d}{dy}(F(x,y))\]
ok
where do i go from here?
g'(y) = 2x +y \(\int g'(y)dy=\int(2x+y)dy\) \[g(y) = 2xy + \frac{y^2}{2}+C\] right?
now test this to see if we get our results: F(x,y) = \(\frac{x^2}{2}-yx+2xy+\frac{y^2}{2}+C\)
\[F(x,y)=x^2/2+y^2/2+xy+C\]
where do i go from here?
depends on what the problem is asking for ... you never realy stated what you needed from this; and we might be missing a y' from that
"Integrate the following homogeneous equation"
well, derive what we got and see if it gets you back to the original
I currently have F(x,y), x, y and C in my answer, how do i get rid of the F(x,y)?
F(x,y) is just the name of the answer ... it equals the equation.
i realise that, but surely the equation itself should contain an equals sign?
no. what we are calling an equation is more accurately denoted as a expression that is equivalent to the function of 2 variables (x,y).
the answer will be the 'expression' once we determine if its correct :)
but surely as my original differential equation contained an equals sign, then it should also contain an equals sign when intergrated?
the integration of 0 goes to a constant if anything .... so the +C absorbs it in a way ...
am still confused sorry... surely our answer should be something like: \[x^2/2+y^2/2+xy+C=?\]
place a C over there if you want .... but its rather pointless
am still confused. surely if we look at a simple example of: \[y'=x^2\]then when we integrate that we get \[y=x^3/3+c\] why are we left with an expression as opposed to an equation when we integrate: \[(x-y)dx+(x+y)dy=0\]?
ok ... lets use that same example but conform it to our problem (x^2)dx - dy = 0 this goes to: F(x) = x^3/3 + C; now why would you get rid of the F(x) and introduce an = sign into the mix?
Surely it would go to: \[x^3/3-y+c=0\]which is the same as \[y=x^3/3+c\]?
sorry if i'm being slow here...
exactly.... y = F(x) in this case ... the +C absorbs any and all constants that are involved in the problem into one nice little package. C = {C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 +...+ C{n-1} + C{n} }
so in our original question, surely that would make our F(x,y) equal to z?
yes...
but is it not possible to give an answer that would only contain x and y?
you seem to be jumping all around the board here. can you think of a way to ask what is on your mind right now in a more clear and concise manner?
I just want to know, step by step if possible, how to answer: "Integrate the following homogeneous equation: \[(x-y)dx+(x+y)dy=0\]"
there is no one way to solve this ... assuming it can be solved. what methods do you know of?
It can definitely be solved, it was a question on a past exam paper
i included the assuming part becasue not all integrands can be solved. such as \(\int e^{-x^2}\)dx
there is 'seperation of variables' which does no good in this instance since we cant seperate x and y into a nice package
there is another method I know of, which I am trying to work on this where you integrate one portion and try to derive it into the other .
ok
M(x,y)dx + N(x,y)dy = 0 int(M(x,y))dx to get a function: F(x,y) +C; where C = some function of y, they tend to name it g(y). Becasue it is a function of y only, it vanishes in the partial derivative with respect to x. Now we derive this down with respect to y to equate it with what we have for the N(x,y)dy part
not to butt in (because i certainly don't know how to do this) but does it say "integrate" or "solve"? you have a first order ode so it is not clear what "integrate" would mean. especially since there is a zero on one side of the equal sign. just asking...
there are other methods, of which i cant recall the details of at the momnet :)
@satellite73 it says integrate
okay
at the moment, M(x,y)dx = (x-y)dx and integrates up to: x^2/2 - yx + g(y) ; we need to derive this with respect to y to get it down to and equate it with N(x,y)dy: (x+y)dy in this case
ok
i get: -x + g'(y) = x+y g'(y) = 2x +y .... since we now know what g' is; we integrate this with respect to y to find g(y) and include it into our integral solution
g(y) = 2xy + y^2/2 to which: F(x,y) = x^2/2 -xy +2xy +y^2/2 +C .... the only problem is, i think there is a chain rule involved in this becasue I cant seem to derive it back down to our original problem
if you don't mind me asking, are you a student/lecturer, and to what level?
or ... ive intergrated wrong by introducing a simple mistake somplace
im a college student in my 2nd year
ok thanks
there is a method of substituting z = y/x but i dont recall the details of it, or even if that part is accurate :)
what do you think of this: http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/f59/first-order-differential-equation-184051.html#post664406 ?
thats the method i cant recall to well :)
this might be better for following the solution :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpLQUGBznE4
thanks, will have a look
understand now, thanks :-)
im understanding it better meself :) youre welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!