im given a table of x and y points and i need to find the logarithmic equation that relates the two. how do i even start?
Okay, well you just need to find the base then. What is the base of the logarithm? So basically if b is your base, x is your first column and y is your second, then b^y=x.
So if you raise both columns to the (1/y) power, then you get b ^ 1 = x ^(1/y)
General form for a logarithmic equation: \[y = log_bx\] So the first interesting point is where y = 1. Because when y = 1, what will your x be?
What are the first few figures of x and y that u have?
x=1,x=2,x=3,x=4,x=5,x=6 when y=1, y=1.189, y=1.316, y=1.414, y=1.495, y=1.565
Everybody seems to have disappeared. The difficulty here is that there is not a logarithmic relation between x = 1 and y = 1 and I am trying to think what else the question could mean.
well thats a formula in my notes that says lny=mlnx
ln y = m ln x ?
yes
It should be \[y = m(ln x)\] And you're trying to find m. So if you have any x,y pair you can solve for m.
thats what i did. im not really sure how to check it though
So you thought to ask us:-)
well when i first posted it i hadnt found that formula
Actually I'm not sure how that can be right, cause we still have the whole problem with (1,1). If x is 1, then we have: \[1 = m(ln\ 1)\] Which has no solutions for m since the ln(1) = 0
Do you have the actual question handy?
find the logarthmic equation that relates y and x. then theres the table of points i gave earlyer
x=1,x=2,x=3,x=4,x=5,x=6 when y=1, y=1.189, y=1.316, y=1.414, y=1.495, y=1.565
I wonder could it be log something +1....
how can we? shouldn't most of those y's be irrational?
I think they are just approximations...
i dont like approximations when we are trying to find an equation to relate x to y
Welcome to the real world:-)
we can only find an approximate equation theen
If it's ln (or log) +1 that gets us out of the 0 problem..
The numbers roughly behave like a log o some sort...
y=x^(1/4)
thats the approximate relation
i remember 2^(1/2)=1.41 blah blah i seen that number for x=4 so i was like 4^(1/4)=1.41 blah blah does this pattern work for the rest and then i was like oh yeah it does!
why we were talking about log?
That's the question, find the logarithmic relation, not just the relation. And the (1,1) stumped us. It looks a bit like lnx shuftied up a bit.
i need to find log equations
so tthe relations is y=x^1/4?
yes
so whats the log equation ?
no log
Maybe it's just log +1.
So I suppose then that: \[ln y = \frac{1}{4}lnx\] Which is the form he was asking for originally.. Just seems like a silly way to write that relation.
well yeah you can take log of both sides of y=x^(1/4)
Then we have 1 , 1.3, 1.47
But then it goes up too fast....
what are you talking about?
If you take log (ordinary log not ln) +1 as the relation..
y=x^{1/4} 1^{1/4}=1 2^{1/4}=1.189207115 3^{1/4}=1.316074013 4^{1/4}=1.414213562 5^{1/4}=1.495349781 6^{1/4}=1.56508458 honestly i have no clue why we are talking about log?
The question asks for the logarithmic relation between the 2 lists.
So the first problem is (1,1) as was discussed at the beginning...
then \[\ln(y)=\frac{1}{4}\ln(x)\]
yeah but whats the point in saying that
none whatsoever !
I guess...
thats what the question asks for
why would we make the equation more ugly just because it ask for a log form
some math teacher asked the question and i guess that is what they want. just a guess though because i lost most of my mind reading powers when they got shot off in the war
I suspect it's a very practical class...
satellite am i suppose to click on that virus?
I have figured out when he puts that up:-)
im not sure who that dude is
"I hold in my hand the last envelope"
Yes, I think we have dealt with this question, after much ado, as they say.
Happy, Swiker?
yes thankyou
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!