Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

State the conditions on the constants which A will be invertible? [k 0 0 0; 1 k 0 0 ; 0 1 k 0; 0 0 1 k]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

from first glance, im gonna say that k isnt -1.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because if k was negative one, then the matrix equation Ax = 0 has a non trivial solution, the vector (1,1,1,1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

theres gotta be more to it though <.< ima think about it more lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we're not necessarily looking for k? I know the answer but just don't know how they got it

OpenStudy (nikita2):

may be you should use detA =/= 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops, i didnt look at the first row, disregard my answer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This section is before learning about determinants, it's in elementary matrices let me post the answer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isnt the determinant of that matrix k^4?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

since it is triangular?

OpenStudy (nikita2):

detA = k^4, so k=/= 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right right :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1/k^4 [k^2 0 0 0; -k^2 k^2 0 0; k -k^2 k^2 0; -1 k -k^2 k^2]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so they actually gave you the inverse of the matrix. thats what that guy looks like.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and you can see from the fraction on the outside that k^4 cant be 0 or we would be dividing by 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so how do you go from the matrix to this answer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you need to use row reduction

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But neither of the matrices are row reduced?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The answer is the inverse correcT?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If that is the case you can find the inverse with row reduction.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The composition of the elementary operations required to take it to the identity is the inverse.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im trying to find that gross formula where you use the cofactors of the matrix, its something like: \[A^{-1} = \frac{1}{detA}A_c\] i dont like using it but it might be the best way to do this problem. do you know what im talking about Alchemista?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The simplest way to find the inverse is by setting up two matrices. One is the original matrix one is the identity.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

As you perform row operations on the original matrix perform the same on the identity.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Gotcha yeah that's how I got it too now

OpenStudy (anonymous):

When you reduce it to the identity the other matrix will be the inverse.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks for your help everyone

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the adjugate matrix, using this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cofactor_(linear_algebra)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I guess that works too but I think the other way is simplest?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes I understand what you are saying but its not as efficient as row reduction. In fact calculating the det in some cases will be much worse than row reduction.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its a diagonal matrix >.< its gonna be really easy to get determinants i know this isnt efficient all the time, i hate this method, but the matrix calls for it

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!