How can I justify whether these are true or false? det(I+A) = 1 + det(A) and det(A^4) = (det(A))^4
The determinant is homomorphic. det(AB)=det(A)det(B). To justify the second det(A^4)= det(AAAA)=det(A)det(A)det(A)det(A)=det(A)^4
The first is not true.
Just show a single counterexample.
Do you need to prove that the determinant is homomorphic? I can certainly discuss that.
I don't think I've even discussed homomorphic
im interested :)
but I see what you mean by a counter example I actually have another one that im stuck on if det(A) does not equal 0 then A is always expressible as a product of elementary matrices
I can't seem to find a counter example this but I can't just say it works
If det(A) is not zero the matrix is invertible. To invert a matrix you perform a set of elementary row operations to take it to its identity. But you can simply invert those operations and compose them to get back to the original matrix.
okay that's justifable thanks! I think our entire class is on here today haha
The point is you can always get from the identity to the invertible matrix.
With elementary row operations. This clear since you can find the inverse and all elementary row operations are by nature invertible.
To show det(AB)=det(A)det(B) also involves the idea of being able to decompose an invertible matrix into a composition of elementary operations.
Each elementary operation corresponds to a change in the determinant.
you mean like, exchanging two rows changes the sign of the det, multiplying a row by a scalar multiplies the det of a matrix by the same scalar, and multiplying a row by a scalar and adding it to another row doesnt change the det right?
Yeah
If either A or B is not invertible than clearly AB is not invertible so det(AB)=0 otherwise you can decompose it into elementary operations and its clear its just the product of all changes to the det.
gotcha, thank you :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!