Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yes
OpenStudy (anonymous):
if its repeated
OpenStudy (anonymous):
You can show it with a delta epsilon proof
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Given that there are infinite number of 9s the limiting value is 1
OpenStudy (anonymous):
my give medal button is gone <.<
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no its not
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Since there are an infinite number of 9s in the decimal expansion you must treat it as the limiting value as the number of 9s approaches infinity.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah it is there are quite a few ways to see it, you can do an infinte geometric series:
\[.9999999...=\frac{9}{10} + \frac{9}{100} +\frac{9}{1000} +\cdots = \frac{\frac{9}{10}}{1-\frac{1}{10}} = 1\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
or you can try to find a number in between them, but you wont be able to:
\[\frac{1+ .9999\ldots}{2} = .99999\ldots \]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
This all boils down to the concept of limit. Read about the delta epsilon definition of the limit.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Let n = "number of nines" we want to show that for any e there is an N such that for all n > N 0.(n nines) is less than |1-e|
OpenStudy (anonymous):
That's easy to show, but my formulation is a bit messy.