are the functions f1=x and f=sinx form a linearly independent set of vectors
on any interval?
we can pick an interval and show that if \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] on that interval, then \[a=0\] and \[b=0\]
In \[\mathbb{R}^2\] I don't believe they do. For example, if you let x=0 you have the zero vector. Which I believe makes them dependent.
of course \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] means for all values of x
they are linearly independent for sure
you certainly cannot write one as a linear combination of the other. that would be a miracle.
But like I said, if you let x=0 then you have a solution to ax+bsin(x)=0 that is NON trivial a and b. :/
to say that \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] on say the interval \[(-\pi,\pi)\] means \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] for all x in that interval.
yes but must be for all x, not for some x
Yeah, so since x=0 makes the a and b non-trivial doesn't that one value make them dependent automatically?
surely you can find a value of x for which \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] but this is an identity of functions, not a value
not the way i understand it, no. we are considering x and sin(x) as functions.
Okay. Then obviously they are linearly independent :P
But i'm assuming sin(x) would have to be on an interval since it is periodic?
if they were dependent one would be a linear combination of the other yes? in other words you could write sine as a linear combination of the identity function. fat chance.
on the interval C'(-infinity, infinity) where C' shows first deravative
this means in the space of functions with first derivatives i believe. of course both x and sin(x) are infinitely differentiable.
i think all you have to do is pick a number for x and show that if \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\] for that number then both a and b are zero. you can pick \[\frac{\pi}{3}\] or anything really
how are they independent
or you can use "wronkian" try here http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/Wronskian.aspx
Let x=0 and that falls apart satellite. Which is what I was trying to say.
Because that gives you a solution where a and b=/=0
ok perhaps i am wrong. but i don't think so. for example it is well known that sine and cosine are linearly independent. but it is certainly the case that \[\cos(\frac{\pi}{4})-\sin(\frac{\pi}{4})=0\] this does not make them dependent. one is not a linear combination of the other
the question is not "is there SOME value of x for which you can solve \[ax+b\sin(x)=0\]
ah ok. we can in fact use wronskian. set up the 2 by 2 matrix x sin(x) 1 cos(x)
take the determinant and get \[x\cos(x)-\sin(x)\]
and i believe theorem says if we can find SOME value for which this determinant is non-zero, then they are independent.
And doing the wronskian you have: \[\det\left[\begin{matrix}x & \sin(x) \\ 1 & \cos(x)\end{matrix}\right]=x \cos(x)-\sin(x)\] Exactly, so they are independent IFF w(x)=/=0 so you have: xcos(x)-sin(x)=0 xcos(x)=sin(x) x=tan(x) Which is only true at x=0 Which is IN THE INTERVAL. Therefore they are dependent from this point of view.
but xcosx(x)-sinx has value of zero for x=0
Which is what I was trying to say the whole time.
but this is linear indepenent in howard and anton linear algebra book
wow are we seeing the same thing but saying different things. i read it to say that if there is SOME value for which the determinant is not zero then they are independent
not that if there is some value for which it is zero they are dependent.
of course they are independent! one is not a linear combination of the other that is for sure. just trying for a "proof"
Hmmm...Maybe I misunderstood. I'm trying to recall the wronskian from diffeq lol.
the fact that they are 0 when x = 0 does not make them dependent, any more than the fact that cosine of pi/4 is the same as sine of pi/4 makes them dependent.
Okay satellite, I concede haha.
The Wronskian can be used to determine whether a set of differentiable functions is linearly independent on an interval. This is useful in many situations. For example, if we wish to verify that two solutions of a second-order differential equation are independent, we may use the Wronskian. Note that if the Wronskian is zero everywhere in the interval, the functions may or may not be linearly independent. A common misconception is that W = 0 everywhere implies linear dependence; the third example below shows that this is not true. However, if all of f1, ..., fn are analytic, then W = 0 everywhere implies linear dependence.
i have confusion about x=0
the wronskian vanishes at x = 0 but it does not vanish everywhere. that is the point.
a set is linearly Independent if the set of solutions only contains the trivial solution x = 0, where x is the zero vector. If ANY other solution exist then they are linearly dependent
They are independent.
ok i got idea
hello math girl. yes of course they are independent. but just because it is obvious doesn't mean you can't prove it
satellite math girl is new comer
Well, here's something that might help: if zero is a vector, k cannot be 0. If k is 0, the vector cannot be zero.
i think this is done via wronskian or sheer obviousness. but i guess obviousness doesn't count, so wronskian does. we come up with some x for which \[x\cos(x)-\sin(x)\neq 0\] and we are finished
i pick \[\frac{\pi}{3}\] but you can pick something else
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!