On a TI-84 Plus, how do you enter a log? like log4(bottom of log)^1
i knw about mine. ^.
^.^
which one do you have?
you mean you want the log base 4? like for example \[\log_4(8)\]
Casio, fx-570ES
I think you need to use the change of base rule on the ti 84 plus
only does log base e or base 10
I like stroodle's approach, convert to base 10 or base e.
ok. I tried to put in log(1)4 and I got the right answer. However, when I did it with log(5)5, i did not.
it makes no difference really. fancy calculators have only the natural log these days. if you want \[\log_4(8)\] put \[\ln(8)\div \ln(6)\]
just looked at 84 + looks pretty straight forward. what exactly are you trying to compute?
ok, thank you so much!! Satellite73, we were trying to do just basic log math, but the answers from the professor did not match the ones we were getting.
ok well if you have a specific question we could walk through entering it into the calculator
log little 5 and then 5 with the answer being 1
well this is not a calculator problem for sure
\[\log_{5}5 \]
since you are basically being asked what power would you raise 5 to to get the number 5. the answer is clearly 1.
it takes longer to put this in the calculator than to think. BUT if you want to use a calculator hit \[\ln(5)\div \ln(5)\] and you will get 1 for sure
idea is that if you want \[\log_b(A)\] you can use \[\log_b(A)=\ln(A)\div \ln(b)\]
ok. so i have to use ln instead of log on the cal?
it doesn't matter which one you use. so long as you don't mix them. you could use \[log_b(A)=\log(A)\div\log(b)\] also
you have two logs on your calculator, log base ten which just say "log" and log base e which is written as "ln"
how did you know to divide the log5^5?
later on your mathematical experience you will not use log base ten which is just a relic of the fact that we write our numbers in base ten.
are you asking me why this works?
in other words, are you asking \[\text{why is } \log_b(A)= \log(A)\div \log(b) ?\]
I guess my problem is when you have log4^1 and knowing which way to put it into the cal. but if u use ln (1)/ln (4) then it does not matter which way u put it in?
wait hold on. i am not sure what 'log4^1" means. do you mean \[\log_4(1)\]?
again this is not a calculator problem. the statement \[\log_4(1)=y\] means \[4^y=1\]
yes, sorry about that!
ok so we just write this in equivalent exponential form and solve by thinking. we think "4 to what power is equal 1?" and the answer is 0 because \[b^0=1\] for any b so \[4^0=1\] so \[\log_4(1)=0\]
in fact for any base b it is true that \[\log_b(1)=0\] by the statement \[b^0=1\]
i think you might be missing something. what does is \[\log_3(9)\]? to find it i solve \[3^y=9\] and since i know that \[3^2=9\] i know \[\log_3(9)=2\]
Wow. Ok, so that makes sense. It has been a few years since I had college algebra:) I used selective memory on this.
likewise to solve \[\log_5(5)\] i solve \[5^y=5\] and get y = 1
and to solve \[\log_4(1)\] i solve \[4^y=1\] and see that y = 0
so no calculator needed for these. now i can use it to cheat if i don't like thinking, or it if looks too complicated
for example if i want \[\log_3(\frac{1}{81})\] i can solve \[3^y=\frac{1}{81}\] and if i happen to know that \[3^{-4}=\frac{1}{81}\] i am done. but if i don't know that i can type in \[\log(1\div 81)\div \log(3)\] and i will still get -4 you can try it
See, now that is my kind of thinking:)
yeah cheating is good if you don't feel like messing around with exponential notation. but you have to know how to do it. doesn't hurt to know some basic properties do you don't have to. in particular you should be fluent in going from \[\log_b(A)=y\] to \[b^y=A\] without hesitation
I guess I just have to go back and re-learn it. I am finished with math, but it is always nice to know. That makes more sense though! Thank u! Can I ask about this one? 7\[^{x}\]=12 the exponent is the x
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!