Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Probability and basic counting principles: In a conference, Dr. Bond's lecture is related to Dr. Hernandez' lecture and should not precede it. If there are six more speakers, how many orderings of the eight speakers are possible? (work to follow...)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Good problem!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So how far did you get with this?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

With 8 speakers, there are 8! orderings. I'm not sure the best way to calculate this, so I created a table, with H being Dr. Hernandez' lecture and numbers representing the number of choices per speaking slot. 6 5 4 3 2 1 H 1 = 6! 6 5 4 3 2 H 2 1 = 6! * 2 6 5 4 3 H 3 2 1 = 6! * 3 6 5 4 H 4 3 2 1 = 6! * 4 6 5 H 5 4 3 2 1 = 6! * 5 6 H 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 6! * 6 H 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 7! Thus, I have 6*6!*6!*7!, or 8!/2, or 20,160 possible outcomes. a), is this correct and b) is there an easier way to solve it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you familiar with the forumula for permutations without repetition?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nPr = n!/r! ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Nearly. nPr = n!/(n-r)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, that one. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Right. And are you familiar with combinations (without repetition)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, nCr = n!/r!(n-r)!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's right. One second though. I think I made an assumption about the problem let me check something.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

Probability and basic counting principles: In a conference, Dr. Bond's lecture is related to Dr. Hernandez' lecture and should not precede it. If there are six more speakers, how many orderings of the eight speakers are possible? (work to follow...) H.B.6.5.4.3.2.1 is what I get if I read it right

OpenStudy (zarkon):

8!/2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

blah. Checking something (again)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Here would be my approach: Using your table, you see there are 7 places Dr H can fill. Each of these has a different number of places Dr B can fill (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) depending on Dr H's position. Regardless of Dr H and Dr B's positions, the remaining 6 can be placed 6! ways. So, set it up for each row... Row 1. There is 1 place for Dr B. so there are 1*6! ways to place Dr B and the other 6 speaker. Row 2. There are 2 places for Dr B. so there are 2*6! ways to place Dr. B and the 6 others. Continue with this and then add them up for the 7 ways to place Dr. H. This give 1*6! + 2*6! + ... + 7*6! = 6!(1 + 2 + ... + 6 + 7)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1 + 2 + ... + 7 = 28, so you'd have 28*6! possibilities

OpenStudy (zarkon):

there are 8! ways to arrange the speakers. Half will have B before H and half will have H before B

OpenStudy (bahrom7893):

Hey polpak once u're done here can u look over this one problem.. I did most of it, I just need to know how to finish it..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

amistrec: H doesn't have to go first. mtbender: Which, I believe is the same as what I did.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Zarkon, it is so simple when you put it that way.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks everyone.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

I just placed H and B someplace where theyd be out of the way ... then counted the rest of them ...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Good observation Zarkon. By requiring B to go after H we remove half of our options.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

itis possible a simply fail to understand the question :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Logically, dividing by 2 makes sense. Is there a way to prove that other than as I and mtbender have done?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The problem is, I could never see the obvious, simple solution on tests...that's why I default to chipping away at it :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hey, I'm with you mtb. ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A basic proof would be if you extended your rows one more to allow H to be last, you can say that each row has a partner that's identical to it. Namely, the first and last rows are the same, 2nd and 7th are the same, etc. You're simply looking at the line of speakers in reverse. So the top 4 of these rows have B happening before H so you don't need to deal with them since you already counted it's pair...in reverse.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!