Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, [\Ax=\lambda x\], must [\A\] always be an non-singular matrix? Can matrix [\A\] be any rectangular singular or square singular matrix to work?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, \[Ax\]\[=lambda x\] Must matrix A always be an non-singular matrix? Can matrix A be any rectangular singular or square singular matrix to work?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What do you mean by work? Are you asking the conditions such that A is diagonalizable?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I thinking to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix A, must matrix A have any condition to have eigenvalues and eigenvectors? Or is it any matrix, singular or non-singular, square or rectangle, have some eigenvalues and eigenvectors?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It does not depend on whether the matrix is singular (has a non-trivial nullspace) it depends on the characteristic polynomial.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Eigenvalue of 0 is non-invertible, I think.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Exactly, thats my point you can have singular matrices with eigenvalues

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I can say that any matrix has some form of eigenvalues(be it complex or real number) and eigenvectors?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sure there will always be eigenvalues since the eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial. Whether they are real or not depends on the characteristic polynomial.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not all matrices have eigenvalues.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh...what kind of matrices may not have eigenvalues and eigenvectors?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If the roots are not real then you can say there are "no eigenvalues" as estudier stated.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

eg (0,-1,1,0) half pi rotation no eigenvalues.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh...So if the eigenvalue turns out to be a complex form, it has "no eigenvalues". But it will still have a proper eigenvector right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If it has an eigenvector it has a corresponding eigenvalue

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since its corresponding eigenvalue is a complex form. It can still have eigenvector too, isn't it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since \[Ax = \lambda x\]\[\text{If there is such an $x$ then there is a corresponding $\lambda$}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

U can deal with a complex eigenvalue as well with a little more work.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If I have a complex number as my lambda value, I can have some eigenvector "x" too, isn't it? Maybe the eigenvector has complex number in it though. Is this right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You have to decide whether your transformation is over the complex field or not.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If you are working with the reals then complex eigenvalues do not exist.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh... I see... Thanks for explaining it to me. Thanks a lot!! :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

One last thing, a matrix is considered diagonalizable if the dimension of each eigenspace is equal to the multiplicity of the corresponding eigenvalue.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If a matrix is diagonalizable you can form a basis, for the vector space, consisting of eigenvectors.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks a lot, Alchemista! :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!