To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, [\Ax=\lambda x\], must [\A\] always be an non-singular matrix? Can matrix [\A\] be any rectangular singular or square singular matrix to work?
To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, \[Ax\]\[=lambda x\] Must matrix A always be an non-singular matrix? Can matrix A be any rectangular singular or square singular matrix to work?
What do you mean by work? Are you asking the conditions such that A is diagonalizable?
I thinking to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix A, must matrix A have any condition to have eigenvalues and eigenvectors? Or is it any matrix, singular or non-singular, square or rectangle, have some eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
It does not depend on whether the matrix is singular (has a non-trivial nullspace) it depends on the characteristic polynomial.
Eigenvalue of 0 is non-invertible, I think.
Exactly, thats my point you can have singular matrices with eigenvalues
So I can say that any matrix has some form of eigenvalues(be it complex or real number) and eigenvectors?
Sure there will always be eigenvalues since the eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial. Whether they are real or not depends on the characteristic polynomial.
Not all matrices have eigenvalues.
ohh...what kind of matrices may not have eigenvalues and eigenvectors?
The eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial
If the roots are not real then you can say there are "no eigenvalues" as estudier stated.
eg (0,-1,1,0) half pi rotation no eigenvalues.
ohh...So if the eigenvalue turns out to be a complex form, it has "no eigenvalues". But it will still have a proper eigenvector right?
no
If it has an eigenvector it has a corresponding eigenvalue
Since its corresponding eigenvalue is a complex form. It can still have eigenvector too, isn't it?
Since \[Ax = \lambda x\]\[\text{If there is such an $x$ then there is a corresponding $\lambda$}\]
U can deal with a complex eigenvalue as well with a little more work.
If I have a complex number as my lambda value, I can have some eigenvector "x" too, isn't it? Maybe the eigenvector has complex number in it though. Is this right?
You have to decide whether your transformation is over the complex field or not.
If you are working with the reals then complex eigenvalues do not exist.
ohh... I see... Thanks for explaining it to me. Thanks a lot!! :)
One last thing, a matrix is considered diagonalizable if the dimension of each eigenspace is equal to the multiplicity of the corresponding eigenvalue.
If a matrix is diagonalizable you can form a basis, for the vector space, consisting of eigenvectors.
Thanks a lot, Alchemista! :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!