Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

All the stars heros sensi champions and other great ppl.. try this a tough one a rod is divided into 4 parts.. what is the the probability that the parts constitute a quadrilateral? especially for people like dalvoron,satellite,ishaan,joe,myininimya,and the other great ppl.. lol

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

truthfolly i just have the answer.. i dont have the solution too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you mean by quad please explain a little : )

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

lol! ishaan a quadrilateral of course!!!! not a square

OpenStudy (anonymous):

For a quadrilateral, each length has to be less than the sum of the other 3 lengths, i.e. \(a<b+c+d\). No piece of the rod may therefore be greater than half the full length of the rod.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ya i agree

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So we rule out the cases where 3 cuts appear in one half of the rod.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

yes agreed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The probability that 3 cuts appear in the left half of the rod is \(0.5\times0.5\times0.5=0.125\), likewise for the right half of the rod.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

wait how is it 0.5*0.5*0.5???????????

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So at most, the odds of the 4 parts constituting a quad is 0.75. A middle piece may be greater than half the length of the rod also though...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Cut 1 has a 0.5 chance of being in the left part of the rod. Cut 2 has a 0.5 chance, Cut 3 has a 0.5 chance. The chance that all 3 are in the same half therefore is the product of those 3 probabilities.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think I'm going about it the wrong way though, because a piece of 1/2 rod may exist anywhere along the length. Need to find the probability that the distance between any adjacent cuts is greater than 1/2 the rod length.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The answer isn't 0.5 is it?

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

BINGO

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

how did you do it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hah, boom. Not exactly sure why that's the answer. I think you'd need to do an integral to prove it. I just figure there's a 1/2 chance that at least half the rod will be intact.

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

nice guess sir.. i still want the solution though...

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

Dalvoron\?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Working on it...

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Nah, I'm stumped. Integration was never my strong point.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

actually you do not need integration for this problem, but as i recall it is a bear

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

plz help satellite!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe an addition series that approximates to 0.5?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or tends towards it, or whatever.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i have seen this for a triangle, but there it is just in two dimensions. here you are in three.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so it is going to be a volume problem rather than an area one. hold on

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I assumed it was in one dimension. Things just got harder.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

did you first do the triangle problem?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Never did a triangle problem. I did a similar stick based problem by Richard Wiseman before, but it didn't help much http://richardwiseman.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/its-the-friday-puzzle-93/#comments

OpenStudy (anonymous):

answer their is easier to come by. i think we can cheat if we want, because this is a pretty standard problem. i am not sure i am up to it but the idea will have some sort of region in it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

god but do i love the internet. if they had had this when i was in school i would have had 5 degrees by now

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hah, nice.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

answer is worked out there, but i would recommend starting at problem 2 first so the idea is more clear. your answer is #4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well got to go to work now anyway. I'll come back to this later.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh and if you keep reading it gets better

OpenStudy (anonymous):

much much better. so perhaps we go to the end an mimic the "simple proof' for the case n = 4

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

yes so what is the non probability proof?

OpenStudy (akshay_budhkar):

satelite? you there?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!