Myininaya's great new method for factoring quadratics (please don't award medals in this thread, u can award them in the below thread if u want to)
http://openstudy.com/groups/mathematics#/groups/mathematics/updates/4e3a5e000b8bf47d066015a8 here are some examples here ax2+bx+c you want to find two factors of a*c that have product a*c and have sum b so we have b=(b/2+z)+(b/2-z) a*c=(b/2+z)(b/2-z)=b^2/4-z^2 <- solve this for z then replace bx with (b/2+z)x+(b/2-z)x then factor by grouping :)
Show an example using a real quadratic....like x^2 + 7x-1 or something
:o)
ok b=7=(7/2+z)+(7/2-z) a*c=-1=(7/2+z)(7/2-z) -1=49/4-z^2 z^2=49/4+1 z^2=53/4 so \[z=\sqrt{\frac{53}{4}}\] so we have \[bx=(7/2+\frac{\sqrt{53}}{2})x+(7/2-\frac{\sqrt{53}}{2})x\] so we have \[x^2+(7/2+\frac{\sqrt{53}}{2})x+(7/2-\frac{\sqrt{53}}{2})x-1\] now factor by grouping \[x(x+\frac{7+\sqrt{53}}{2})+\frac{7-\sqrt{53}}{2}(x-\frac{1*2}{7-\sqrt{53}})\] \[x(x+\frac{7+\sqrt{53}}{2})+\frac{7-\sqrt{53}}{2}(x-\frac{2(7+\sqrt{53})}{49-53})\] \[x(x+\frac{7+\sqrt{53}}{2})+\frac{7-\sqrt{53}}{2}(x+\frac{7+\sqrt{53}}{2})\] \[(x+\frac{7+\sqrt{53}}{2})(x+\frac{7-\sqrt{53}}{2})\]
:)
Thanks much :)
Beautiful Solution
its pretty long but i love it :)
It's awesome....
Why did you use z instead of d
I'm nitpicking
you can use d lol i just got stuck on z because satellite said z
i was using ? instead
Oh
z is a nicer looking variable then ?
Ok, fess up...who awarded the medal?
Me? How many cool points do I lose for it?
Myininaya, you just proved that any quadratic can be factored.
yep i did. it also works for the complex number :)
i mean i can factor over complex numbers too :)
Excellent. I'm having an argument with a tutor over it as we speak. You should publish this somewhere....
an example over the complex numbers
how do i publish this
Magnificent....
I found this: www.ams.org/notices/200711/tx071101507p.pdf
Honestly, I feel like I've been lied to my whole life....
lol why
because you didn't know you could factored all quadratics without the quadratic formula
used z because i used it!!
thats what i said lol
lol
i gave you credit
i could chose some other letter or stuck with ?
i don't deserve it. make a nice pdf of this and save it
but i wanted to please you
thank you
ok of the general thing right?
satellite i came up with something i have a brain omg this is so weird
nice job :) but its just not abstract enough for me ;)
needs more celtic runes, and a dash of thyme
lol
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/quadform.htm this site sometimes the quadratic doesn't factor at all lol
myininaya>purplemath
What the.....lol
What does Purple Math mean anyway?
i dont know what that means lol i'm trying to see if i can find what i have done somewhere
Probably not
here's another example if anyone is interested: \[x^2+1\] \[x^2+0x+1\] a=1,b=0,c=1 \[b=(\frac{0}{2}-z)+(\frac{0}{2}+z)\] \[a*c=1=(\frac{0}{2}-z)(\frac{0}{2}+z)=-z^2\] \[z=i\] \[x^2+-ix+ix+1\] \[x(x-i)+i(x+\frac{1}{i})=x(x-i)+i(x+\frac{1}{i}*\frac{i}{i})\] \[x(x-i)+i(x+\frac{i}{-1})\] \[x(x-i)+i(x-i)=(x-i)(x+i)\]
Much simpler
well we could had solved x^2=-1 to begin with lol
hmmm
to find the factors
true x^2 = -1
x=i , x=-i x-i=0, x+i=0 which means x^2+1=(x-i)(x+i)
beautiful
very nice!
it is very cool right? i couldn't find anything like it on the internet yet is it unique i wonder?
I don't know
so we don't have to use completing the square to prove the quadratic formula
it gives another nice way to derive the quadratic equation :)
good stuff myininaya
i made a mistake in my pdf
i think
try latex much nicer
dang it i see the mistake
i wrote a stupid a where there shouldn't had been one i been really lame at math lately
i was so excited i sent all of this to my ex-teachers and i didn't make it pretty or check it lol
I've done that before with students :0
lol
i hope they will be interested in my emails
I'm sure they will
:)
you want a latex version?
now you need to generalize your technique to cubic polynomials ;)
ha ha
Yes, I was thinking that too...and perhaps even for all polynomials
lol
you guys are crazy
especially you hero
that would not be possible :)
At least for cubic polynomials
i think they might have a way to solve cubics but it isn't popular for some reason and i don't know about it
cubics and quartics, but that is it
why don't they talk about those in algebra
i mean what do you need to solve them? it is just algebra?
omg
@ zarkon i found a formula for 5th degree polynomial. it is very elegant
really?
i dont trust that word elegant when the cubic wasn't elegant
that was my feeble attempt at a joke. galois says it is not possible.
lol
"However, there is no formula for general quintic equations over the rationals in terms of radicals; this is known as the Abel–Ruffini theorem, first published in 1824,"
;)
A5 is simple ;)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!