What is the vertex for f(x)=x^2 -4x-3?
can't wait to see this...
you want to complete the square. when you have an equation in the form: \[x^2+bx+c\]first you divide b by 2 and square the result: \[(-\frac{4}{2})^2 = 4\] You add and subtract that value to your function: \[x^2-4x+4-4-3\] Then you group and factor: \[(x^2-4x+4)-4-3 = (x-2)^2-7\] So the vertex is (-2, -7)
...
i knew it!
It was 2,-7
well(2,-7)
whoops, sign error >.< its supposed to be what you said.
no one want to use the oh so simple \[x=-\frac{b}{2a}=-\frac{-4}{2\times 1}=2\]
(-b/2a,-D/4a) a = 1 ,b =-4 D = 16+12 = 28 => (2,-7)
lol
i hate that formula!
first coordinate is 2, second is what you get when you replace x by 2
nothing could be simpler
I prefer simple lol
x = 2, y = 4-8-3=-7 done vertex is (2,-7) finito stick a fork in it
>.>
everyone here hates this simple simple simple formula
no one objects to \[\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\] but i you erase the radical part they have a fit. why is that/
just get rid of the radical and you have \[-\frac{b}{2a}\] easy easy easy
all that stupid completing the square work and keeping track of what you add and subtract? for the birds. it is always \[-\frac{b}{2a}\] and the explanation is simple too
I cant stand when they throw all that extra crap in there, they're just going to have you take off
exactly. the point is, if you know that the first coordinate is \[-\frac{b}{2a}\] then you know what the second coordinate is by substitution. you do not need to keep track all the way down the line
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!