Find a piecewise definition of f that does not involve the absolute value function. --->
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[f(x)=\left| x+4 \right|\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
square it and take square root
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[\sqrt{(x+4)^2}\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i think we are over complicating it...they actually want a piecewise function this time.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I can do this nicely in LaTeX, one second
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
me too!
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[f(x) = |x+4| = \left\{\begin{array}{c|c}
x + 4 & x \geq -4 \\
- x - 4 & x < -4
\end{array}
\right.\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah thats what they were looking for. we can one-up them though with our:
\[\sqrt{(x+4)^2}\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
lol
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[ f(x) = \left\{
\begin{array}{lr}
-x-4 & : x <-4\\
x+4 & : x \geq 4
\end{array}
\right.\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (zarkon):
I prefer commas
\[f(x) = |x+4| = \left\{\begin{array}{rc}
x + 4, & x \geq -4 \\
- x - 4, & x < -4
\end{array}
\right.\]
and right justifying the terms :)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
a line is nice and clean
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah yours is better
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[f(x) = \left\{
\begin{array}{lr}
-x-4 & : x <-4\\
x+4 & : x \geq -4
\end{array}
\right.\]
OpenStudy (zarkon):
or
\[f(x) = |x+4| = \left\{\begin{array}{rcc}
x + 4 & \text{if} & x \geq -4 \\
- x - 4& \text{if} & x < -4
\end{array}
\right.\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!