see attached... both questions
OK, the first question
Are you familiar with integrals?
yes
Cool, so to me, seems that the first question boils down to being an integral question for the function \[x^{1/2}\] on the interval [a,b]
ok. where did you get x^1/2?
In the question, you have \[\sqrt{x}\] which is \[x^{1/2}\]
Using the exponential form makes it easier to work with
oh, sorry, I was looking at a totally different problem just now! haha ok I totally see where you're coming from now
visually
Heh, right, no problem
The first equation actually is \[\[\int\limits_{a}^{b}x^{1/2}dx\]
What parts aren't you understanding?
I just don't know where all those numbers are coming frm before the sigma part. Is it a Reimann sum?
Yep, I think you're right
You can use the integral concept here because as \[n \rightarrow \infty\], the width \[\] gets infinitely small, and the subintervals become just the right size. if you can imagine before with the concept, if you were to try to approximate the area under the curve with just two subintervals, like 2 rectangles, the approximation would not be as good as one with 3 because they would fit a little better
Here is a nice picture
ok...
You had the curve for \[\sqrt{x}\], and your trying to find the area under the curve, on the closed interval [a,b]
And the sigma equation is telling to add up all the area of the subintervals, and the area of each subinterval is height * width...height is actually determined by the function \[\sqrt{x}\], like when you draw the graph of \[y=\sqrt{x}\], and then have the width ad \[\Delta x\]
The limit part before the sigma wants to consider as the width of each interval gets smaller and smaller, approaching so small that is difficult to determine, infinitely small, as \[n \rightarrow \infty\], so the space between each gets smaller and smaller
\[\int\limits_{a}^{b}x^{1/2}dx\]
So your limit + sigma equation has become the conventional representation of an integral I believe
ok. thank you. I have to go but thanks for your help and time!
Sure, I hope you can get at least the first question
Yes What they are trying to convey is riemanns sum
So I would first intewgrate x to the 1/2 and then plug in the b and a?
Yes, you'd do F(b) - F(a), where F(x) is the antiderivative found from integrating \[x^{1/2}\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!