Consider the division of set A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} by subsets {1,6},{2,7},{3,8},{4},{5}. Define a relation in A by R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}. Show that R is an equivalence relation.
you have 3 things to show
what are those sir
reflexive,symmetric, transitive
yes that will make R equivalence right ?
if all 3 hold...yes
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
?
they give you the definition....use that definition to show the 3 things
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
i mean to say that the part of the question " Define a relation in A by R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}." is a question or not ?
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
sorry couldn't understand this" and when u hit 4 u start to go above the parameters given correct"
just show for any \[a\in A\] \[(a,a)\in R\]
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
how ?
then for any \[(a,b)\in R\] you have \[(b,a)\in R\]
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
but how will i show them sir ?
you are over thinking this
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
??
this is the definition of R R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}
pick any number from 1 to 8
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes it is given in the question. But what to do then ?
call it a if a is in a set is a also in that set :)
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
ok lets take (1,6)
help me also see qus
@zarkon r u posing as zarkon from voltron ?
I am Zarkon from Voltron
sorry
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
Sir please help me. Kindly post the answer in a single post
help me
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
What is the prob.?
kush help me
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
k i will help u .
and all of u
I don't understand why you keep posting the same thing... after the word 'by' it gives the definition of R...that is what it is. you are not defining anything.
yes u can help me
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
sir it is not my mistake it is the mistake of my internet
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
sorry !! Please don't mind those sentences sir u continue in the solution
skip reflexive...try symmetric ...
of example \[(1.6)\in R\] correct?
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes
is \[(6,1)\in R\]
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
why sir ?
in other words...are 6 and 1 in the same subset?
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
i got that sir . So R is symmetric. Then ?
the symmetry holds for (1,6) and (6,1)
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes sir
you would really need to show it is true for all pairs
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
U mean to say for (1,6) and (6,1) then (2,7) and (7,2) right ?
(n,n+5) and (n+5,n) are symmetric for n=1,2,3
yes...that would work too
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
Okay
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
but what about (4) , (5) ?
they don't have pairs so they will be just covered under reflexivity
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
i.e. \[(4,4)\in R \]
yes
\[(n,n)\in R\] for \[n=1,2,\ldots,7,8\]
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
okay now transitive ?
normally you would need something like this if (a,b) in R and (b,c) in R then (a,c) is in R
but our sets are so small we only have limited options
for example... if (1,6) in R and (6,1) in R is (1,1) in R?
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
Okay I will try it.
yes...since we already have that by reflexivity :)
but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so
yes
If f(x) = (5x + 3)/(4x-5), x is not equal to 5/4, show that fof is an identity function.
Sir next question
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!