Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Consider the division of set A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} by subsets {1,6},{2,7},{3,8},{4},{5}. Define a relation in A by R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}. Show that R is an equivalence relation.

OpenStudy (zarkon):

you have 3 things to show

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what are those sir

OpenStudy (zarkon):

reflexive,symmetric, transitive

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes that will make R equivalence right ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

if all 3 hold...yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (zarkon):

?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

they give you the definition....use that definition to show the 3 things

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean to say that the part of the question " Define a relation in A by R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}." is a question or not ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry couldn't understand this" and when u hit 4 u start to go above the parameters given correct"

OpenStudy (zarkon):

just show for any \[a\in A\] \[(a,a)\in R\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

then for any \[(a,b)\in R\] you have \[(b,a)\in R\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but how will i show them sir ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

you are over thinking this

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

??

OpenStudy (zarkon):

this is the definition of R R = {(a,b) : a and b lie in the same subset of the division of A}

OpenStudy (zarkon):

pick any number from 1 to 8

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it is given in the question. But what to do then ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

call it a if a is in a set is a also in that set :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok lets take (1,6)

OpenStudy (nilankshi):

help me also see qus

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@zarkon r u posing as zarkon from voltron ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

I am Zarkon from Voltron

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sir please help me. Kindly post the answer in a single post

OpenStudy (nilankshi):

help me

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What is the prob.?

OpenStudy (nilankshi):

kush help me

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

k i will help u .

OpenStudy (nilankshi):

and all of u

OpenStudy (zarkon):

I don't understand why you keep posting the same thing... after the word 'by' it gives the definition of R...that is what it is. you are not defining anything.

OpenStudy (nilankshi):

yes u can help me

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sir it is not my mistake it is the mistake of my internet

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry !! Please don't mind those sentences sir u continue in the solution

OpenStudy (zarkon):

skip reflexive...try symmetric ...

OpenStudy (zarkon):

of example \[(1.6)\in R\] correct?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (zarkon):

is \[(6,1)\in R\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

why sir ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

in other words...are 6 and 1 in the same subset?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got that sir . So R is symmetric. Then ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

the symmetry holds for (1,6) and (6,1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes sir

OpenStudy (zarkon):

you would really need to show it is true for all pairs

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

U mean to say for (1,6) and (6,1) then (2,7) and (7,2) right ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

(n,n+5) and (n+5,n) are symmetric for n=1,2,3

OpenStudy (zarkon):

yes...that would work too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about (4) , (5) ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

they don't have pairs so they will be just covered under reflexivity

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i.e. \[(4,4)\in R \]

OpenStudy (zarkon):

yes

OpenStudy (zarkon):

\[(n,n)\in R\] for \[n=1,2,\ldots,7,8\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay now transitive ?

OpenStudy (zarkon):

normally you would need something like this if (a,b) in R and (b,c) in R then (a,c) is in R

OpenStudy (zarkon):

but our sets are so small we only have limited options

OpenStudy (zarkon):

for example... if (1,6) in R and (6,1) in R is (1,1) in R?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay I will try it.

OpenStudy (zarkon):

yes...since we already have that by reflexivity :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about define a relation in A by R =............... and so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If f(x) = (5x + 3)/(4x-5), x is not equal to 5/4, show that fof is an identity function.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sir next question

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!