is a function one to one if it has a verticle asymptote?
one to one meaning it has an inverse.
its one-to-one if it follows: \[f(x_1) = f(x_2) \Longrightarrow x_1 = x_2\] In other words, if it passes a Vertical Line test.
it doesnt matter if it has a vertical asymptote or not.
Yes even though the function approaches the vertical asymptote it never actually becomes it, even though it looks identical to it at extremely high values. So yes it would still have an inverse
wait, isn't that just test if its a function to test if its one-to-one wouldn't you have to do like a Horizontal line test Ex: y=x^2
it really depends on the function itself. a graph like: \[y = \frac{1}{x^2}\] has a vertical asymptote at x = 0, but does not have an inverse over the real numbers, while the graph: \[y = \frac{1}{x}\]also has a vertical asymptote at x = 0, but does have an inverse over the real numbers.
I have a graph, and I'm suppose to determine whether it's one to one, and then graph the inverse of it.
the asymptote verticle lies on x=4
and it goes up and towards the left, from quadrant IV, through I, into II
can you take a picture an upload it?
ok ill get my cell phone one sec
do a vertical line test. if the graph hits each vertical line only once, its one to one. as far as graphing the inverse, like dichiaraj is saying, we would need a picture to see it better.
okay uploading
it passes a vertical line test, its one-to-one. assuming the pic is sideways lolol
it passes the verticle line test, so it's one to one. how do i figure out the equation?
I thought the horizontal line check was to see if it was a one-to-one function?
horizontal is just to check if its a function or not.
it passes the horizontal test, then the verticle test.
so it's a function, with an inverse :P
vertical line test to determine if its a function horizontal line test to determine if it has an inverse
wait wait...im getting them backwards lol
right, i stand corrected.
its vertical for function, horizontal for one-to-one.
so verticle test shows function, horizontal test shows if it has an inverse. okay
what does algebraic definition of f(x) mean on that picture i uploaded? I don't understand the question it's asking for.
right do the vertical to make sure each x has a y then the horizontal to check for one-to-one
function of x
ohhhh i thought it was asking for an equation to the graph, lmao
well their are ways to figure that out but no it's not asking that of you as of yet
how do I do part B of the second part?
"The inverse of f of x is one to one with f of x?"
i feel like these questions are vague!
I can't see what your asking on the pic you uploaded
B. If f(x) one to one? If so, determine it's inverse both algebraically, as well as graphically.
Heres a new pic
it's not letting me post another picture?
Does it give you a function?
or just the graph?
nope, just a graph. The teacher hinted that it has base e for it's function
with a verticle asymptote of 4
well graphicaly is going to be pretty easy, flip the paper over and draw the same graph, check the link for http://www.answers.com/topic/hyperbola an example
ok so i flip it and rotate it 90 degrees?
http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/ahd4/A4hypola.jpg here is a picture of a hyperbole and it's inverse graphed on the same paper
hmm i get log base 3 for this graph notice point (1,1) starting with log(4-x) log(4-1) = 1 log(3) = 1 base = 3 \[y = \log_{3} (4-x)\]
maybe he said "base 3" and not " base e"
no i could be wrong
i found a point (4,2) that contradicts my theory :(
lol =]
im over thinking it, \[y = \ln (4-x)\]
im figuring out the graph right now, i think i got that part. :P
then solve for x to get inverse nice :) yeah you just flip the axis like zbay was saying
my graph turned out perfect. i think everything is good now. ill give u a medal =D
I like medals too!
lol joe
>.>
lolol
you got backwards :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!