make a truth table for this problem. :) (~p V q) --> p
i am trying to work this out .. :)
What've you got so far? Have you done the p, ~p, q columns yet?
p -p q -p^q t f f f f t f f f t f t t t
so if ~ p Or q is T then its T right?
.... mixed and with or .... dint i
Right. Amistre got his operator mixed up.
At least I'm not the only one.
p -p q -porq t f f f f t f t f t t t t t :)
if i recall: p -> q t t t t f f f t t f f t is the basic set up for the conditional
for the ~p V q is t f t f t t t
should it be 8 rows down right?
-pVq -> p f t = t t t = t t t = t t t = t f f = t t f = f t f = f t f = f
i think 8 is good for rows
The second one should be f
if T then T would be T, right?
right but you have it wrong... the 2nd row should be T F F and then 4 column should be F
am i wrong polnak?
Sorry, lemme check here..
do i have to have column for -->p also?
You need a column for \[(\lnot p \vee q) \implies p\]
so i should have 5 columns right?
Yes
(~pV q)-->p is my final column
Correct
this is what i have to column 4 ... t f t f t t t f
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c} p & \lnot p & q & \lnot p \vee q & (\lnot p \vee q ) \implies p\ \\ \hline T & F & T & T \\ T & F & F & F \\ F & T & T & T \\ F & T & F & T \end{array}\]
I'm not sure why you have so many rows.
(~pV q)-->p is my final column
idk thats what was told by our professor.. lol
There are only 2 variables, so there should only be \(2^2= 4\) rows
If there were 3 variables (p, q, r) for example then there would be \(2^3 = 8\) rows
but we do have 3 of them ~ p p and q
no, ~p depends on p it is not independent.
oh ok...
the number of rows depends on the number of independent variables.
but we have ~ p p and q for the column
Yes, but again, p and q can vary freely. ~p is ALWAYS the opposite of p.
so ~p depends on the value of p it is not a free variable
ok.. so column 4 should be t f t f
No, lets see your table so far and see what's goin on.
p q ~p (~p V q) (~pVq) -->p T T F T T F F F F T T T F F T F
the 8 rows i believe comes from introducing the "->p" part, to accomodate p as t and f. a bit redundant to me tho
That last row in the fourth column should be True. ~p is True, so ~p OR q is True because at least ~p is True.
ok
Amistre, you only have rows for the different combinations of your independent variables. Any derived values don't need their own rows as they cannot vary independently of the independent variables.
owowowow ... i read :a brand new world" and "man search for meaning" this week so I had to forgot a few things :)
Heh.. I know how that goes.
so the final column would be T F F F
So any time \(\lnot p \vee q\) is F, \((\lnot p \vee q)\implies p\) will be T (regardless of p)
But if \(\lnot p \vee q\) is T then \((\lnot p \vee q) \implies p\) is T ONLY IF p is T
If the antecedent is True then the truth of the implication depends on the consequent. But if the antecedent is False, it doesn't matter what the consequent is. The implication is vacuously True.
So it's T, T, F, T
i thought there can only be 1 T for the final column?
Nope, that's what I was saying.. If Column 4 is F then no matter what p is, column 5 will be T.
If column 4 is T, then column 5 will be T only if p is T.
This is the general form of an implication: \[\begin{array}{|cc|c} g&y& g\implies y\\\hline T & T & T\\ T & F & F\\ F & T & T \\ F & F & T \end{array}\]
i must have column 4 wrong.. i have T F T T
that is right for column 4
Whoopse the answer I gave before is wrong. \[\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c} p & \lnot p & q & \lnot p \vee q & (\lnot p \vee q ) \implies p\ \\ \hline T & F & T & T &T \\ T & F & F & F & T \\ F & T & T & T & F \\ F & T & F & T & F \end{array}\]
I have a hard time unless I do it in the table ;)
u put the ~ p in a different spot then me.. i put it after the q
The order of the columns won't change anything
oh ok... i have the same answer as you ;)
\(T \implies T\) is \( T\) \(F \implies T\) is \( T\) \(T \implies F\) is \( F\) \(T \implies F\) is \( F\)
that is for IF right ? -->
Yeah it's like 'if ... then ...'
ok
ty hon... i gotta get ready for work.. i will be back with another truth table tonight.. lol
\[p \implies q\] if p is True then q Must be True
Ok, have a good day at work =)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!