Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\int tan^2(t)dt\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the owlfred is white .... you spose to be green or they change that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[sin^2(t) + cos^2(t) = 1\] \[\implies tan^2(t) + 1 = sec^2(t)\]\[\implies tan^2(t) = \frac{1}{cos^2(t)} - 1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think we need that one if I remember right.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

maybe, i had considered using a useful form of 0 tho; like +1-1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

gets the same results

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\int tan^2(t)+1-1dt\] \[\int sec^2(t)-1dt\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And we need the one I can never recall: \[cos^2(t) = \frac{cos(2t) + 1}{2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh. Actually we don't need that first one.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's this last one that's the important bit

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the reduction in powers is a good thing to remember fer sure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

better you than me!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if its done right, i think it gets to \[\int tan^2(t)dt=tan(t)-t+C\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think without the square

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh right, what you wrote

OpenStudy (anonymous):

reminiscent of \[\int log(x)dx=x\log(x)-x\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yep

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm maybe parts works instead of reduction formula?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

nah, just +1-1 and stab away

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int \sin^2(x)sec^2(x)dx\]?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

that would be fun to throw at the kids lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

got a nice dv there right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i am guessing but might work

OpenStudy (amistre64):

there is no nice dv in that one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sec^2(x)=dv\] \[v=\tan(x)\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

how does that make an easier intergral from the first one tho?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ignore me i am just guessing.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the simplest way i saw, is to add 0; and solve \[\int tan^2(t)dt => \int tan^2+1-1dt\] \[\int (tan^2(t)+1)-(1)dt =>\int sec^2(t) -1 = tan(t)-t+C\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah that looks nice and easy. easier still is to go right to \[\tan^2(x)=\sec^2(x)-1\] and take anti derivatives

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lol ... yeah, but that was way to easy :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!