evlutate :( (1-u)+1)^2
this is part of an intergral i am doing
intergral: (x+1)^2(1-x)^5
isn't this \[(2-u)^2\]?
i choose u as being (1-x) and then reworte x in terms of u
but x=1-u
then i subs it in to (x+1)^2
satellite help meeee
i think that is just swapping apples for oranges
so, then how would i go about solving this, i got no clue
do i just have to expand
think best bet is to grind it til you find it multiply all that crap out, combine like terms, integrate term by term, cheat and uses a machine
but, there has to be another way i am not seeing, cause this is a problem from the solving integrals by sub chp
here http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate++%28x%2B1%29^2%281-x%29^5
after i expand each term: (x+1)^2 and (1-x)^5 i have to multiply them together right?
\[u=x+1\] \[1-x=1-(u+1)=2-u\] and now you have \[u^2(2-u)^5 which buys you nothing
let me think before i speak
zarkon?
sate
how about u=1-x that would make multiplying it out a little easier
I don't see a really nice way at first glance
man , but in the end i will still have to sub back in that 1-x and multiply it out
I would sub back 1-x but I wouldn't multiply it all out
so i would get: (x^2+2x+1)(u)^5
oh yes zarkon is as usual right. it is just a question of figuring out the cheapest way to do the multiplication
\[u=1-x\] \[x+1=2-u\] and then \[(2-u)^2u^5=(4-4u+u^2)u^5=4u^5-4u^6+u^7\] but this doesn't really help either does it because you still have to either integrate and then expand, or expand and then integrate. sorry
how did you get that: x+1=2-u
what is wrong with integrating ...substituting back 1-x and then leaving as it is ...it will be the anti derivative.
sure why not. everything will just be in terms of 1- x instead of x
\[u=1-x\] \[x=1-u\] \[x+1=1-u+1=2-u\] is the answer to your question
got you homie
let me get down to work
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!