Why is 0! = 1 by definition; but 0^0 is an indeterminate form?
! <------Because of this...maybe
im curious because x^0 is bad form since it can result in 0^0; but why not define it as 1 with the rest of normailty :)
even I am curious about that
don't change it to 1 ! it will mess up a lot of math ppl already did in the past. just keep the status quo!
but imran told me 1^0 is 1 ...2^0 is 1 and 2^1 is 2 so 0^0 is indeterminate
yep; 0^0 is a bad an apple as 1/0 ....
but if you get 0!, well, thats just fine lol
lol
Actually, 0! = 1 by contemporary tradition. Many people claim that it is 0 via proof. A lot of well known math and applied physics professors have claimed that 0! = 0 and keep 0! = 1 simply because our formulas break down without it true.
well, amistre - you know, google is taking over the world. and they are thinking the same as you !!! http://www.google.com/#hl=en&cp=3&gs_id=b&xhr=t&q=0^0&qe=MF4w&qesig=P_7nEjebZ63RBy_0L3TWtA&pkc=AFgZ2tmznUgQ768b34VKG_p3k9L1-owtjcHfUX4llZ-f1m6qKvPdDvoBqjCKZLPpL2vTTLs2LErF4wXiMlC_5NNUjW1fA8pjuA&pf=p&sclient=psy&site=&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=0^0&aq=0&aqi=h1g5&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&fp=7f38cb74ed69968b&biw=1440&bih=700
Theres an awesome site that has professor proofs of 0! = 0 let me see if i can find it
lol ... google 0^0 = 1, i love it
Lol
and we had doubts today about wolfram Ishaan :)
what did wolfram do?
he was smart ! that tells us what we were.
Lol
i seen that as well
it began me thinking with why we have 2 rules for derivatives; d\dx (x) = 1 d/dx (x^n) = n*x^(n-1)
d/dx (x^1) = 1*x^1-1 = 1*x^0 ..right?
but this goes bad when x=0 .... for some reason that cant be defined
Right
interesting i guess
its a cute story :)
but check this out :) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y+%3D+x^0+at+x%3D0
That is so confusing
That's why it's called indeterminant - nobody know what the heck to do with it.
Lol
But seriously I am very confused now...
hold on. there is lots of controversy (ok a little) still about what \[0^0\] is of course as a statement about limits it is indeterminate, but as a symbol many define it to be 1. those are different issues
wolfram seems to be schismed about it as well
0^0= bad form http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=0^0 but, f(x)=x^0 ; f(0)=1 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y+%3D+x^0+at+x%3D0
we seem to be in my own little universe ... all i see is my questions, and i cry ...
There once was a student from Trinity, Tried to take the square root of infinity. Whilst counting the digits Was seized with the fidgets. Gave up math and took up divinity.
only one of two clean ones i know
limericks eh ... that was a good read.
i like the 0^x is rather unimportant; yet if 0^x = 0 for the most part; then why would we attribute it to 0^0 = 1 instead of 0 if x^0 is 1 for the most part, how can we define it as 0 as well. and of course they have different limits and such
not particularly one of the best but one of the few i would post here
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!