Let r(t) = (24 sin(16t), -4, 24 cos(16t)). Compute d/dt(1/2r'(t) * r"(t))
r'(t)=(16(24)cos(16t),0,-16(24)sin(16t)) r''(t)=(-16^2(24)sin(16t),0,-16^2(24)cos(16t)) Let w=16^2(24) to keep our sanity r''(t)=(-wsin(16t),0,-wcos(16t)) now before i start the d/dt(1/2)(r'(t)*(r''(t)) is the r'(t) in the denominator or the numerator?
It's actually 1/2 * r'(t).
ok then let z=16(24) then r'(t) dot r''(t)= ((z)cos(16t),0,-(z)sin(16t)) * (-(w)sin(16t),0,-(w)cos(16t))= ((-zw)cos(16t)sin(16t)+(zw)cos(16t)sin(16t)) d/dt((r'(t)*r''(t))= Im going to pull out the zw because i already am hating how its looking zw(d/dt(-cos(16t)sin(16t)+sin(16t)cos(16t)) to me thats looking like 0
which means they are orthogonal (⊥) to eachother
Even with the 1/2 next to r'(t), will it still equal to 0?
yes because you can pull the 1/2 out and dot them first then add in the 1/2 after. wz/2 can be pulled out. is the answer not 0?
Actually I got 0 as well when I was working on this. So I guess it should be right. But I'm still checking on it.
yeah well its an UGLY problem in deed. well if you took away all coefficents and were left with (sin(t),-4,cos(t))=r(t) r'(t)=(cos(t),0,(-sin(t)) which is ⊥ to r(t) r'"(t)=(-sin(t),0,-cos(t)) which is ⊥ to r'(t)
r'''(t)=(-cos(t),0,sin(t)) which is ⊥ to r''(t) pattern
lol, it was annoying and I pretty much got the same as you have. I've asked a couple of my friends about this and they said they all ended up with 0 as well. So maybe that is right.
Anyways, thanks again for helping me. :)
welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!