Show that the following matrix has only one distinct eigenvalue. What is it? (matrix in comments)
\[C=\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0&1 \\ -1 & 0&1\\-1 & 0&1\end{matrix}\right]\]
let me see if i we can work together as i've never done this yet i'm in linear algebra as of now
Great - always good to have others working on the same material!
\[\text{hint: the eigenvalues} \ \lambda \ \text{satisfy the equation:}\] \[\det\left(A-\lambda I\right)=0\]
my books has the equatoion \[(\lambda I - A)x = 0\]
as i haven't done determinants yet and the last time i did them was 4 years ago i might just tick with this equation
hmm never seen it in that form
that might be an intermediate step
alright so i'll do it your way jim if i understand determinants right
gahd i hate the equation editor how do you make a 3x3
\[\det(A-\lambda I) = (-1-\lambda)(0-\lambda)(1-\lambda)+0+0-(1)(0-\lambda)(-1)-0-0=0\]
Fill in the blanks \[\left[\begin{matrix}? & ? & ?\\ ? & ? & ?\\? & ? & ?\end{matrix}\right]\]
Is that along the right lines? (sorry this is a bit confusing, helping both of us!)
hold on
looks right sorta
that looks right
if \[A=\left[\begin{matrix}a & b&c \\ d&e&f\\g&h&i\end{matrix}\right]\] then det(A) = (aei + bfg + cdh - ceg - bdi - afh) ... according to my notes!
the characteristic polynomial is just \[-\lambda^3\] thus the only eigenvalue is 0
When you take the determinant of \[\large A-\lambda I\], you should get \[\large -\lambda^3\]
my book shows expanding the matrix by the first two colums
which is what you have so if you correctly wrote it down, then yes that is correct
yes, if feldy expands and simplifies then it'll come to negative lambda cubed
Yep :) thanks!
... OK if the next part of the question is "Obtain a complete set of independent eigenvectors of C. Your answer should be a set of column vectors." ... How would one go about answering that?
Jim , got a calculator questiooon go on group chat
ok one sec
the eigenvectors that correspond to \[\large \lambda\] will be the vectors x that satisfy the equation \[\large A\vec{x}=\lambda \vec{x}\] But \[\large \lambda = 0\], so \[\large A\vec{x}=(0) \vec{x}\] which means that \[\large A\vec{x}=0\] So solve this equation to find your eigenvector
Great, thanks so much!
Sorry - have been busy between when this was first posted, and now.... Just getting back to this question... By using the Ax=0 equation, does that give you:\[\left[\begin{matrix}-1 & 0 &1\\-1 & 0 &1\\-1 & 0 &1 \end{matrix}\right] \left[\begin{matrix}x_1 \\ x_2 \\x_3\end{matrix}\right] = 0\] \[ie, -x_1+x_3 = 0\]\[x_1 = x_3\] .... How does this help in finding the eigenvectors??
Looks like you have two free variables let \[x_3=t\text{ and }x_2=r\] write out the solution in terms of \[t\text{ and }r\]
So my answer to this would be {[t,r,t]}??
no...have you ever found the null space of a matrix?
y...es? What do I do with it, once I found the null space? Thanks for the helpl (as always!)
this problem turned into finding the null space \[A\vec{x}=0\]
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!