Surface Integral anyone?
no/.
no thanks .. not hungry :)
straight no.
{x^2 y, -x y^2, z} over x^2 + y^2 + z^2 =9
No divergence theorem
without Div theorem? F * dS dS=||Rx X Ry|| z^2+y^2+x^2=9 z=SQRT(9-(x^2+y^2)) (x,y,Sqrt(9-(x^2+y^2)) lets choose either spere or polar Theta=Q R(r,Theta)=(rcos(Q),rsin(Q),Sqrt(9-r^2)) ||Rr X RQ||= i j k cos(Q) sin(Q) -r/SQRT(9-r^2) -rsin(Q) rcos(Q) 0 =r^2cos(Q)/SQRT(9-r^2)i+r^2sin(Q)/SQRT(9-r^2)+rk TAKING THE MAGNITUDE= HELP ME OUT IRANMEAH91
for some reason , it is only parameterize for sphere ; not other surface
did i not parameterize the surface correctly?
you did,but I am looking at examples and they only parametrize for sphere; not for paraboloid
whats the equation of a paraboliod i could try to parameterize it
They just use the gradient for other surfaces
NO NO NO NO NEVER USE THAT S*** its the worst thing to use
ndS= do not every use delf/||delf||(delf))
lol, strong feeling
yes ok i think your speaking of n vector =delf/||delf|| right ?
yes
ok ill make it super easy for you this may take a second
\[\nabla F/|\nabla F|\] or \[r_a \text{cross} r_b\] divided by it magnitude
if you have some function of x and y like we did above z=x+y then f(x,y)=x +y well when you parameterize the surface or whatever you do its (x,y,f(x,y)) partial of z=f(x,y)=fx simular to fy Rx X Ry= i j k 1 0 fx 0 1 fy Rx X Ry=(-fx,-fy,1)=ndS so anytime you have to use ndS parameterize and shove it into the xy plane which you do by dotting it with ndS and integrate using brother greens method
so if your given z+y+x=1 z=-x-y+1 ndS=(1,1,1)
oh, I see; thankss
welcome and when you have x^2/a^2+y^2/B^2=z you can turn this into polar right now (rcos(Q),rsin(Q),r^2cos^2(Q)/a^2+r^2sin^2(Q)/b^2) then you ||Rr X RQ||drdQ=dS to do surface integrals though ndS is for curl, div theroem
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!