How do you solve implicit differentials?
the same way you solve explicits
the rules dont change
right, but sometimes you can't just move the x's and y's around, and i don't understand what exactly is done to get y'.
i suspect thats because you were taught an improper manner
do you know what a derived bit is?
yes or no will suffice
nope.
ok :) then tell me, what do you believe the derivative of 4x is?
4.
nope; it is 4 x'
now, if i said what is the derivative of 4x with respect to x; then the solution is 4 x' such that x'=1
oh crud. that's right! it makes sense.
what is the derivative of 3x^2 ?
(6x^1)(x'=1)
yes :) or simply 6x x' that derived little bit your used to tossing out automatically since it tends to be equal to 1 with respect to x
tell me what is the derivative of y ?
if y is a function of x, then it's y'? or maybe y(x)' or maybe... >.<
its what its always been: y'
the derivative of: y = 3x^2 is y' = 6x x'
the derivative of: 5y = 3x^2 is 5 y' = 6x x' y' = (6x x')/5
implicits are the same thing that youve been doing all along; just in the end; sort out your y' bits that have fallen out
that makes sense. :) but how do you derive it when the problem gets scary looking? (as in x^2(y) +3x) or something of the like.
same way as you would alwyas do it; use product rule for products; and so on and so forth. tell me, what is the derivative of: xy ?
[x^2(y) +3x]' = x^2' (y)+x^2 (y)' +3 x' = 2xy x' +x^2 y' +3 x' = 2xy +x^2 y' +3 -2xy -3 = x^2 y' -2xy -3 ------- = y' x^2
[xy]' = x'y+xy' ; thats the product rule right?
yep. :)
holy crud. you made sense out of that mess! and it made sense to me when you did it!
\[[\frac{x}{y}]'=\frac{yx'-y'x}{y^2}\] and thats the quotient rule right?
all implicits are is NOT throwing out the derived bits ....
and in the end sort it out :)
what happens if there is a problem with x and y seperatly? like x^3 + 2y^2
\begin{align} [x^3 + 2y^2]'&=[x^3]' + [2y^2]'\\\\ &=3x^2\ x' + 4y\ y'\\\\ 4y\ y'&=-3x^2\ x'\\\\ y'&=-\frac{3x^2\ x'}{4y} \end{align}
and since x' = 1; we can delete it in the end
spose we are deriving with respect to time tho; all the derived parts stay in at the end
mmm, this one i didnt understand. :(
if x is a variable, why couldn't you just use the product rule? or was tha done in a different way?
do you recall that the derivative of a sum is the sum of the derivatives?
oh wait. the chain rule was used, right? how does the chain rule work in respect to y?
[f(x)+g(x)+h(x)]' = f'(x) x' +g'(x) x' + h'(x) x'
oh yeah, i remember that kind of.
the chain rule is always in effect, its what gives us that derived bit
lets step thru this ok? [x^3 + 2y^2]' = [x^3]' + [2y^2]' right?
okay, i kind of see what happened. so the product rule was used on y's function, and then there was a direct derivation of y. makes sense, i believe. :)
[x^3]' + [2y^2]' 3x^2 x' + 4y y'
the power rules are used on both of these
you could argue for a product rule; but to keep it simple, lets apply th epower rule
and i spose technically you could say we use the constant rule and what nots; but i think they make way to many rules
okay, sounds good! if they were multiplying like in xy^2, would it be 2y(y')(1)
let me check :) [x y^2]' = x' y^2 + x y^2' = x' y^2 + x 2y y'
the product rule doesnt change just becasue its implicit
okay, i think this makes sense now! thank you soooo much. you don't know how you've saved me. i owe you! :)
spose you had a few multipliers: xyz [xyz]' = x'yz + xy'z + xyz'
good luck with it :)
if need be, go back to all those ones your used to, and put the derived bits back in :)
sounds good. :) will do. thanks, buddy!
i got stuck on a practice problem which was x^3 -xy+y^2. how does this one work out?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!